Loading profile…
@Krzyszt40559764 · Unclaimed · Rank #79 (Top 89%) · All time · 7 days horizon How it’s ranked
No risk no porsche HODL.
Coverage 8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
14
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
14.3%
2 correct / 12 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
-1.6%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−1.7%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
186d
8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+6.9%“@karlbooklover A lot of people thought the same at the BTC bottom and bought ETH, expecting it to outperform BTC. It didn't. Will it outperform this time? Maybe. Good luck. I'm sticking with BTC. I think $180k (a 3x move) is very achievable.”
Worst call
-5.1%“@bitcoindata21 30–40? What? lol... If you manage to pull that off, respect. I’m aiming for a safer 2.3x from here on BTC.”
Every token @Krzyszt40559764 has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 2 tokens, all time.
Last called 30 Oct 2026 · 14 calls since 11 May 2026
12 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 6 Aug 2026
By month resolved · 7 days horizon
12 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:26 | “@imperial_btc We probably tested the 50-week MA. I'm travelling, so I can't check right now, but I think it's around $77K. A similar test to the one in 2023. Very bullish.” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @Krzyszt40559764 head to head.
All time · 7d
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| $77,696 |
| 7d |
| $75,950 |
| -2.2% |
| incorrect |
| 23 Sept 2026, 09:57 | “@GeoMetric_9 Thanks 🤝” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $85,849 | 7d | $83,598 | -2.6% | incorrect |
| 21 Sept 2026, 13:17 | “@CryptoJelleNL Told ya brah, you just didn’t wanna listen. Nobody wanted BTC at 60k so now y’all chasing higher. You’ll still print, just less. https://t.co/sdr2kd68SK” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $85,445 | 7d | $83,630 | -2.1% | incorrect |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:26 | “@imperial_btc In my opinion this is probably a new cycle. BTC dropped below the 200w MA, and every time it did that it meant a reset and a new cycle. In that situation it’s hard to imagine BTC growing only those 30% from 126k.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $76,869 | 7d | $76,660 | -0.3% | incorrect |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:45 | “I’m thinking along similar lines, but more like a 3x. From a ~60k bottom, 3x would put BTC around 180–195k; if I can sell there, I’d be happy with that. Last cycle I was counting on 10x and got unpleasantly surprised. This time I’m being more realistic: 3x, maybe 3.5x, especially since I also hold some ETH. We’ll see” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,424 | 7d | $75,930 | -3.2% | incorrect |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:06 | “@GeoMetric_9 100k incoming” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $79,906 | 7d | $77,858 | -2.6% | incorrect |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | “@GeoMetric_9 ETFs together with Michael Saylor were the main drivers of this bull run. Macro conditions were weak, which is exactly why there was no altseason. Looking ahead to 2027/28, the macro backdrop should improve and things should look solid. BTC +$180K ETH +0,06BTC” | ETH | ▲ Bullish | $1,914 | 7d | $1,888 | -1.4% | incorrect |
| 10 Jul 2026, 10:20 | “@imperial_btc One thing though: I think if this is a new cycle, it will go a bit higher than 160k, probably reach 200k+. We'll see.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $64,355 | 7d | $63,120 | -1.9% | incorrect |
| 26 Jun 2026, 15:23 | “@karlbooklover So below $50k there's basically nothing but thin air, no real support. If Bitcoin drops to $50k, it'll probably hit $40k shortly after.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $60,227 | 7d | $61,864 | +2.7% | incorrect |
| 22 May 2026, 11:44 | “@bitcoindata21 30–40? What? lol... If you manage to pull that off, respect. I’m aiming for a safer 2.3x from here on BTC.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,342 | 7d | $73,370 | -5.1% | incorrect |
| 15 May 2026, 10:34 | “@CryptoJelleNL https://t.co/0qrjGCTA6C Bitcoin is correlated with IGV, not SPX. We already had a major correction in March, the war in Iran, and nothing really happened - BTC pulled back slightly, but even though markets were weak, it didn’t drop below 60K. Bottom is in” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $80,710 | 7d | $77,225 | -4.3% | incorrect |
| 11 May 2026, 13:06 | “@camelfinance People like you were saying “40k next” when Bitcoin was at 60k sats. The difference now is that you’re waiting for 60k… even though 60k was within reach not long ago. The bottom is probably behind us, so keep waiting, my friend. In the end, you’ll buy back above 100k https://t.co/epY6YfMzDD” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $81,036 | 7d | $76,896 | -5.1% | incorrect |
