Published 10 Sept 2026, 12:26 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC
Krzysztof #BTC
@Krzyszt40559764
In reply to · 10 Sept 2026, 11:41 UTC · context given to the AI
@Krzyszt40559764 New cycle scenario is plausible, but I’d be more cautious about the new ath targets Geo mentions, though honestly, I think they want to drive everyone crazy so you won’t anticipate btc’s next move and that will lead to a quick peak and a crash. I’ll be posting about this soon.@imperial_btc In my opinion this is probably a new cycle. BTC dropped below the 200w MA, and every time it did that it meant a reset and a new cycle. In that situation it’s hard to imagine BTC growing only those 30% from 126k.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 77995.3 / 76869.11 − 1 = +1.5%d × r = +1.5% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction