Loading…
Published 15 May 2026, 10:34 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC
Krzysztof #BTC
@Krzyszt40559764
Quoting · 15 May 2026, 07:41 UTC · context given to the AI
$IGV and $BTC remain in a 1:1 correlation IGV seems to have broken above and retested previous support. Looks good for continuation. $BTC could then be doing the same thing, but with a bit more bullish ascending variant (pic 1). And, just to remind you, we've been looking for a bottom at a deviation above range lows in a form of an expanded flat correction. We got it and accepted back inside the range with a RECORD volume. Nothing close to it in 25 years. So, again, odds of lower prices are quite low according to this too. (pic 2)In reply to · 15 May 2026, 09:57 UTC · context given to the AI
$BTC moved like this, in a time where the stock market did that. What happens when $ES decides it's time for a pullback?@CryptoJelleNL https://t.co/0qrjGCTA6C Bitcoin is correlated with IGV, not SPX. We already had a major correction in March, the war in Iran, and nothing really happened - BTC pulled back slightly, but even though markets were weak, it didn’t drop below 60K. Bottom is inView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 77931.76 / 80710.29 − 1 = -3.4%d × r = -3.4% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrectOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction