Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 30 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC

Krzysztof #BTC

@Krzyszt40559764

In reply to · 30 Oct 2026, 10:04 UTC · context given to the AI

While you're now turning bearish, I'm turning bullish🐻🔄🐂 There's a lot of worry out there when you can't see the big picture with #Bitcoin The next push is going to be really strong https://t.co/h7NlhAvV0j

@imperial_btc We probably tested the 50-week MA. I'm travelling, so I can't check right now, but I think it's around $77K. A similar test to the one in 2023. Very bullish.

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $77,696 at 30 Oct 2026, 11:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $77,261 at 31 Oct 2026, 11:00 UTC.
r = 77260.93 / 77695.92 − 1 = -0.6%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -0.6% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “@imperial_btc We probably tested the 50-week MA. I'm travelling, so I can't check right now, but I think it's around $77K. A similar test to the one in 2023. Very bullish.”
Confidence: 98%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction