Loading profile…
@Krzyszt40559764 · Unclaimed · Rank #83 (Top 94%) · All time · 4 hours horizon How it’s ranked
No risk no porsche HODL.
Coverage 8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
14
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
35.7%
5 correct / 9 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
-0.3%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.3%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
186d
8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+0.8%“@CryptoJelleNL Told ya brah, you just didn’t wanna listen. Nobody wanted BTC at 60k so now y’all chasing higher. You’ll still print, just less. https://t.co/sdr2kd68SK”
Worst call
-1.8%“@CryptoJelleNL https://t.co/0qrjGCTA6C Bitcoin is correlated with IGV, not SPX. We already had a major correction in March, the war in Iran, and nothing really happened - BTC pulled back slightly, but even though markets were weak, it didn’t drop below 60K. Bottom is in”
Every token @Krzyszt40559764 has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 2 tokens, all time.
Last called 30 Oct 2026 · 14 calls since 11 May 2026
12 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 6 Aug 2026
By month resolved · 4 hours horizon
9 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:26 | “@imperial_btc We probably tested the 50-week MA. I'm travelling, so I can't check right now, but I think it's around $77K. A similar test to the one in 2023. Very bullish.” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @Krzyszt40559764 head to head.
All time · 4h
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| $77,247 |
| 4h |
| $76,702 |
| -0.7% |
| incorrect |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:04 | “@spaceshill45571 @imperial_btc We’ll never see Bitcoin at $55K again.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $80,715 | 4h | $80,717 | +0.0% | incorrect |
| 23 Sept 2026, 09:57 | “@GeoMetric_9 Thanks 🤝” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $85,849 | 4h | $85,783 | -0.1% | incorrect |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:26 | “@imperial_btc In my opinion this is probably a new cycle. BTC dropped below the 200w MA, and every time it did that it meant a reset and a new cycle. In that situation it’s hard to imagine BTC growing only those 30% from 126k.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,781 | 4h | $76,881 | -1.2% | incorrect |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:06 | “@GeoMetric_9 100k incoming” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $79,816 | 4h | $78,834 | -1.2% | incorrect |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | “@GeoMetric_9 ETFs together with Michael Saylor were the main drivers of this bull run. Macro conditions were weak, which is exactly why there was no altseason. Looking ahead to 2027/28, the macro backdrop should improve and things should look solid. BTC +$180K ETH +0,06BTC” | ETH | ▲ Bullish | $1,911 | 4h | $1,904 | -0.3% | incorrect |
| 10 Jul 2026, 10:20 | “@imperial_btc One thing though: I think if this is a new cycle, it will go a bit higher than 160k, probably reach 200k+. We'll see.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $64,359 | 4h | $64,055 | -0.5% | incorrect |
| 22 May 2026, 11:44 | “@bitcoindata21 30–40? What? lol... If you manage to pull that off, respect. I’m aiming for a safer 2.3x from here on BTC.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,245 | 4h | $76,621 | -0.8% | incorrect |
| 15 May 2026, 10:34 | “@CryptoJelleNL https://t.co/0qrjGCTA6C Bitcoin is correlated with IGV, not SPX. We already had a major correction in March, the war in Iran, and nothing really happened - BTC pulled back slightly, but even though markets were weak, it didn’t drop below 60K. Bottom is in” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $80,557 | 4h | $79,092 | -1.8% | incorrect |
