@sminston_with · Unclaimed · Rank #37 (Top 49%) · 90 days · 4 hours horizon How it’s ranked
Bitcoin ⚡ Engineering PhD ⚡ Data & tools https://t.co/TaPKiZgBNX
Coverage 8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
27
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
59.3%
16 correct / 11 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+0.0%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.1%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
1
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
186d
8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+0.9%“I think Bitcoin is gonna pump any day now.”
Worst call
-1.5%“Did you know you can measure Bitcoin the way you'd measure a factory? 🏭 It costs $50.4K in machines and electricity to produce one coin. It sells for $83.3K. So you're paying a 39% markup over production cost. Here's what matters. Across sixteen years, every time that markup was under 35%, Bitcoin was higher twelve months later. Every single time, no exceptions. Above 65% markup? Higher only 37% of the time. Today's 39% is at the cheap end of that range, and 70% of the last five years were pricier than right now. Might make sense to pick some up. NFA”
Every token @sminston_with has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 1 token, all time.
Last called 9 Nov 2026 · 49 calls since 11 May 2026
49 bullish · 0 bearish
By month resolved · 4 hours horizon
11 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:23 | “I would not bet against Bitcoin's power law forecast” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @sminston_with head to head.
90 days · 4h
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| $76,115 |
| 4h |
| $75,520 |
| -0.8% |
| incorrect |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:30 | “Did you know you can measure Bitcoin the way you'd measure a factory? 🏭 It costs $50.4K in machines and electricity to produce one coin. It sells for $83.3K. So you're paying a 39% markup over production cost. Here's what matters. Across sixteen years, every time that markup was under 35%, Bitcoin was higher twelve months later. Every single time, no exceptions. Above 65% markup? Higher only 37% of the time. Today's 39% is at the cheap end of that range, and 70% of the last five years were pricier than right now. Might make sense to pick some up. NFA” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $82,647 | 4h | $81,428 | -1.5% | incorrect |
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:52 | “@CRYPT0N1TE No, it assumes it will be somethinf like $100k or higher next year. Its the .05 quantile.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $84,135 | 4h | $84,000 | -0.2% | incorrect |
| 21 Sept 2026, 14:54 | “You're in the perfect zone- bullish structure, yet still highly undervalued $BTC” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $86,062 | 4h | $86,053 | -0.0% | incorrect |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:13 | “Remember the massive Bitcoin jump in August? Came at you fast, didn't it? That's how the next leg up will be, too. Don't take your eye off the ball 👁” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $76,228 | 4h | $75,984 | -0.3% | incorrect |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:10 | “INCREDIBLE. This first instance of the power law model of Bitcoin's price in time was shared in February of 2013. It predicted $93,725 for today, September 2, 2026. Right now the price is $77,450 - only 17% under Dacoinminister's prediction. As we move into the next bull run it will prove even more accurate. https://t.co/vgwdA9jklf” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,335 | 4h | $77,135 | -0.3% | incorrect |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:23 | “@AshCrypto Extremely bullish for Bitcoin https://t.co/AZnRRxZqis” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,779 | 4h | $78,085 | -0.9% | incorrect |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:42 | “BITCOIN:🪙GOLDEN❎CROSS🪙Incoming. 1. The exact roll-forward puts the golden cross on September 9, 12 days from now 2. In the near term (1-3 months), neither golden 🪙nor death ☠️crosses matter much for forward returns 3. At 6 months, the golden cross has real edge over the death and more strongly suggests upward trajectory 3b. Gold median of +40% forward ROI vs. Death median of -3% forward ROI 4. Median implied price AT the estimated golden cross date (Sept 9) is $80,282 5. 6-month (Mar 9) implied Bitcoin price target (IQR) IF we hit that upcoming golden cross: $94k - $149k 5b. Median implied price = $112,748 And: this isn't even when the bull run will be finished - not by a long shot, I believe. NFA” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,802 | 4h | $77,386 | -0.5% | incorrect |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:01 | “@BitcoinMagazine @Polymarket The momentum is shifting, especially now that miners are finding their footing once again https://t.co/9VyL9CosVr” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $80,385 | 4h | $80,281 | -0.1% | incorrect |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:48 | “Looks like BTC may be turning up for the recent ISM PMI uptick after all. 🙈🙉🙊 Whaddya know. https://t.co/SiHO0aX3qu” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $72,777 | 4h | $72,706 | -0.1% | incorrect |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:24 | “Here's the buffer that absorbed four years of quantitative tightening. The reverse repo facility peaked at $2.554 TRILLION on the last day of 2022. Today it holds $255 million. One hundredth of one percent of the peak! 🤯 Money parked overnight at the Fed could drain away without ever touching bank reserves, and all $2.5 trillion of it did exactly that. 📉 Now look at the past year: Fed assets: +$116B Treasury cash account: +$460B Reverse repo: -$56B The Fed added liquidity, and the Treasury took back almost four times as much. There's nothing left to cushion the next one. 💡Now think of the last disappointing 'dampened' Bitcoin 'bull run': The 2023–2025 (pseudo) bull run was a cycle run on flat liquidity. Not contracting; the buffer prevented that. But not expanding either. Compare that to 2020–2021, where net liquidity went vertical and so did Bitcoin. It's making more sense now. A pseudo-bull run unsupported by macro, by Fed policy, by sentiment - only running of the ETF launches and possible halving narrative. But Bitcoin will have another proper bull run, yet.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $64,534 | 4h | $64,340 | -0.3% | incorrect |