Loading profile…
@KillaXBT · Unclaimed · Rank #15 (Top 17%) · All time · 30 days horizon How it’s ranked
Quantitative trader, 7 years.
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
155
28 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
65.2%
101 correct / 54 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+4.6%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.4%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
189d
5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+34.9%“I have a small spot $SOL allocation. I’m not particularly bullish on it long term, but I think there’s a good chance we see something like this play out once $BTC starts trending higher again. Personally, I’m targeting a 75–100% move here, nothing too crazy. Patience. https://t.co/OCxR2COmtg https://t.co/uCmZZPe7fq”
Worst call
-25.1%“No surprise so far… $BTC is down 2.8% since FOMC. In 6 of the last 7 cases, we saw average drops of 4-5%. If this reaction mimics the past, we could test the low 60-61K area. Overall, you wouldn't want to see us lose 60K otherwise we will end up sweeping the lows. https://t.co/4EfPJSpNrG https://t.co/ImJMWaTwh9”
Every token @KillaXBT has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 9 Nov 2026 · 245 calls since 5 May 2026
161 bullish · 84 bearish
Last called 2 Nov 2026 · 7 calls since 7 Jun 2026
5 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 17 Oct 2026
By month resolved · 30 days horizon
102 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:23 | “We are never seeing $50K again. We are never seeing $60K again. You would be lucky to even see sub $70K again. Every single time $BTC has created a new weekly high, the trend shifted. Why assume this time will be any different? https://t.co/QP96f0gmTe https://t.co/i54xoTdNiE” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @KillaXBT head to head.
All time · 30d
| BTC |
| ▼ Bearish |
| $83,762 |
| 30d |
| $80,681 |
| -3.7% |
| correct |
| 24 Sept 2026, 17:05 | “$BTC Every swing trade I’ve shared over the past 360+ days has played out exactly as planned. My next swing short is positioned in the $89–92K region, with invalidation above $96K. I’ll wait patiently for price to reach my level, then execute. I’m not interested in trying to catch every small move up and down. I’m focused on the cleaner 10–30% moves.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $84,091 | 30d | $80,167 | -4.7% | correct |
| 21 Sept 2026, 13:57 | “I’m looking to hedge short 50% of my $BTC exposure between 89K–94K. This will be my first short in months. As I said 1-3 days ago, I had no interest in shorting the same highs we were compressing below. The hedge is invalidated on acceptance above 97K. https://t.co/4MxPxHfAHM https://t.co/4wKnmMaFV4” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $85,445 | 30d | $83,731 | -2.0% | correct |
| 20 Sept 2026, 20:42 | “You have approximately 5B in visible $BTC short liquidations from 83-85K. In an uptrend, shorts getting liquidated are forced to buy back their positions. Those market buys push price higher, liquidating more shorts above and creating a chain reaction of demand. The same thing happened during the move from 67K to 80K and I expect the next leg higher to play out the same way.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $81,073 | 30d | $82,741 | +2.1% | correct |
| 19 Sept 2026, 19:01 | “$BTC As we can see, expectations heading into FOMC were overwhelmingly bearish, yet again, the market did the opposite. If you followed the plan, you caught an 8% move to the upside. Congrats. I have many pivots like this, which I share behind closed doors in KillaLabs. The platform opens every 3 months and includes my pivots, strategies and custom indicators. A lot of people have been DMing me asking when the next opening will be. It will most likely be in November. Until then, we ball.💥 The rest of September is going to be an eventful month.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $81,343 | 30d | $81,769 | +0.5% | correct |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:27 | “So who the fuck is laughing now? All week the same clowns were talking shit. Now they’re eating it. I was right. They’re loud, wrong, and broke. Last laugh is mine, yet again. If you’re scalping, do what you want. We saw a 3.87% bounce. If you’re swing trading like I am, hold. $BTC” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,996 | 30d | $81,960 | +5.1% | correct |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:26 | “It has been the plan all along... $BTC If one is unable to stick to their own plans, they will never survive long enough in this market to see them play out. I might be 1-3% early, but that means nothing when I’m positioning for a far bigger move. https://t.co/g5CEvGp0JV https://t.co/TPGiXZgts9” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $75,702 | 30d | $81,334 | +7.4% | correct |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:24 | “Dumping into FOMC. You already know the drill. I’ve been playing this particular pivot for two years now, and it has proven its effectiveness when inversing the narrative. Expectations > reality. The move happens before the data. The interesting part is that whenever $BTC has pumped into FOMC, it has had an insanely high tendency to reverse back down. Whereas when it dumps clearly into the event and forms a more bearish narrative than bullish, it reverses back to the upside. You know what I’m implying here. We’re dumping into it, so be prepared for a recovery afterwards.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $76,579 | 30d | $80,095 | +4.6% | correct |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:20 | “During macro accumulation, volume consistently builds around the lows. Once we reclaim the POC and establish the VAL, it signals a breakout from the accumulation range & we never trade below the POC again. Volume doesn't lie... $BTC https://t.co/DwLSIfdxnB” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,745 | 30d | $83,384 | +7.3% | correct |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:45 | “Ironic... Tomorrow is the 14th, and $BTC is dumping into it, creating the perfect bearish narrative. You already know the drill. When we dump into significant dates or lows, I look for the inverse move. Next week, I'd be expecting a 3-4% move back to the upside at a minimum. https://t.co/dZ7UFJmsJ0 https://t.co/qxHov7DZvq” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $76,732 | 30d | $83,262 | +8.5% | correct |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:51 | “GM. ☕️ Probably not a bad idea to look for some $BTC scalp longs if you haven’t already.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $76,642 | 30d | $83,247 | +8.6% | correct |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:15 | “Swept the lows > pumped into the highs > retraced 60% of the move after already wiping out longs. Late shorts start piling in, creating fresh liquidity above that can become the next target. A ~1.2% push from here would partially fill that liquidity above on $BTC. https://t.co/LyuI5kkLi2” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,893 | 30d | $83,816 | +7.6% | correct |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:47 | “The bottom impulse candle never gets fully filled. A lot of people are always looking at the "imbalance", the "major weekly FVG", or the low volume transacted around that particular price region. Now, targeting imbalances can work, but during a bull market, the majority of imbalances formed by strong legs higher usually don't get fully filled. In fact, bottoming impulse candles historically tend to remain unfilled. And I think there's a relatively simple explanation for that. We chopped for 2 months, then pumped 27%, and the market is still sitting in disbelief. There isn't necessarily any incentive for the imbalance below to be fully filled. The imbalance formed in the first place because roughly 6B worth of shorts were liquidated, and that's only the visible liquidations we can actually see publicly. So, based on this context, the imbalance below doesn't need to be fully filled, and there's a good chance it won't be. The most we saw in 2022 was a partial fill, and even then, that wick was very quickly bought up. If we saw something similar this time around, it would equate to $BTC testing the low 70Ks. But again, that's not something I would guarantee either. The purpose of this post is simply to give you some insight into the characteristics of how bottoms are formed, and why these major imbalances can remain unfilled as price continues higher after months of chop. Technically speaking, I don't believe BTC will ever revisit my 62.6K 2x long entry again. I don't even expect it to revisit my 65.8K spot notional average that I shared publicly. In my view, the absolute worst case retest would be somewhere just shy of $0K, potentially the high 69Ks in the event of some form of capitulation. Outside of that, I don't expect anything significantly deeper. And even that could be a stretch. We could quite easily hold the 73K-75K region before eventually putting in another leg higher towards 85K. The main point is simple, an imbalance existing below price does not mean the market is obligated to fill it.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,810 | 30d | $82,801 | +6.4% | correct |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:58 | “The bottom always forms after 2 red 6 month candles. As stated, $BTC is HTF bullish & the bottom is in. https://t.co/dUuTyI0Hi4” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,733 | 30d | $83,060 | +5.5% | correct |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:53 | “You should never try to rationalize irrational markets. I see so many people trying to predict the next “S&P 500 crash” or the next “BTC drop.” Take a look around. The market doesn’t reward the person trying to be rational. And that’s literally because everyone is conditioned to think the exact same way. “Oh, it will eventually cool down a bit.” “Oh, it has to come back down eventually.” BTC doesn’t have to give you your ideal retest. Neither do legacy markets. You would make far more money being a bull and looking for continuation longs once the trend has shifted than trying to rationalize a market that is inherently irrational. The market is designed to exceed expectations. Thats how they build fomo! Rationally speaking, $BTC could test $69–70K. But if we’re speaking from a psychological perspective, we might only get $72–74K, or even just a sweep of our $75K PWL before testing the highs again. All I’m saying is bull cycles tend to have shallow retests. Rather than trying to short the market back down to where you think it should retest, you’re probably better off gradually scaling in with low leverage and DCA’ing into the position. At least, that’s exactly what I would be doing if I wasn’t already exposed.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $80,057 | 30d | $85,296 | +6.5% | correct |
