Loading…
Published 21 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Killa
@KillaXBT
Quoting · 20 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC · context given to the AI
I’ll be looking to $BTC at 89,070. I’m not interested in shorting the same 81K highs again & again. Compression within an uptrend will always lead to expansion eventually. It's simply a matter of when, and I’m not willing to take that risk. Even if we range here for longer, I’d rather wait for higher prices. I’m not willing to scrape peanuts within a range when the more profitable move is simply to sit on your hands and wait. People who traded the 62-67K range should have already learned that lesson the hard way. You wouldn't want to make that mistake again would you?I’m looking to hedge short 50% of my $BTC exposure between 89K–94K. This will be my first short in months. As I said 1-3 days ago, I had no interest in shorting the same highs we were compressing below. The hedge is invalidated on acceptance above 97K. https://t.co/4MxPxHfAHM https://t.co/4wKnmMaFV4View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 86333.37 / 85444.68 − 1 = +1.0%d × r = -1.0% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrectOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction