Loading profile…
@Krzyszt40559764 · Unclaimed · Rank #60 (Top 82%) · 90 days · 7 days horizon How it’s ranked
No risk no porsche HODL.
Coverage 8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
8
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
12.5%
1 correct / 7 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
-1.3%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−1.5%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
186d
8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+3.6%“@spaceshill45571 @imperial_btc We’ll never see Bitcoin at $55K again.”
Worst call
-3.2%“I’m thinking along similar lines, but more like a 3x. From a ~60k bottom, 3x would put BTC around 180–195k; if I can sell there, I’d be happy with that. Last cycle I was counting on 10x and got unpleasantly surprised. This time I’m being more realistic: 3x, maybe 3.5x, especially since I also hold some ETH. We’ll see”
Every token @Krzyszt40559764 has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 2 tokens, all time.
Last called 30 Oct 2026 · 14 calls since 11 May 2026
12 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 6 Aug 2026
By month resolved · 7 days horizon
7 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:26 | “@imperial_btc We probably tested the 50-week MA. I'm travelling, so I can't check right now, but I think it's around $77K. A similar test to the one in 2023. Very bullish.” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @Krzyszt40559764 head to head.
90 days · 7d
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| $77,696 |
| 7d |
| $75,950 |
| -2.2% |
| incorrect |
| 23 Sept 2026, 09:57 | “@GeoMetric_9 Thanks 🤝” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $85,849 | 7d | $83,598 | -2.6% | incorrect |
| 21 Sept 2026, 13:17 | “@CryptoJelleNL Told ya brah, you just didn’t wanna listen. Nobody wanted BTC at 60k so now y’all chasing higher. You’ll still print, just less. https://t.co/sdr2kd68SK” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $85,445 | 7d | $83,630 | -2.1% | incorrect |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:26 | “@imperial_btc In my opinion this is probably a new cycle. BTC dropped below the 200w MA, and every time it did that it meant a reset and a new cycle. In that situation it’s hard to imagine BTC growing only those 30% from 126k.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $76,869 | 7d | $76,660 | -0.3% | incorrect |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:45 | “I’m thinking along similar lines, but more like a 3x. From a ~60k bottom, 3x would put BTC around 180–195k; if I can sell there, I’d be happy with that. Last cycle I was counting on 10x and got unpleasantly surprised. This time I’m being more realistic: 3x, maybe 3.5x, especially since I also hold some ETH. We’ll see” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,424 | 7d | $75,930 | -3.2% | incorrect |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:06 | “@GeoMetric_9 100k incoming” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $79,906 | 7d | $77,858 | -2.6% | incorrect |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | “@GeoMetric_9 ETFs together with Michael Saylor were the main drivers of this bull run. Macro conditions were weak, which is exactly why there was no altseason. Looking ahead to 2027/28, the macro backdrop should improve and things should look solid. BTC +$180K ETH +0,06BTC” | ETH | ▲ Bullish | $1,914 | 7d | $1,888 | -1.4% | incorrect |
