Loading profile…
@Travis_Kling · Unclaimed · All time · 24 hours horizon How it’s ranked
Host - @thingshiddenio. Founder - @ikigai_fund. God exists.
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
3
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
66.7%
2 correct / 1 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+0.2%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.6%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
1
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
189d
5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+1.9%“@cryptoklotz Yes. The very deep pockets that need to be convinced to buy many billions of dollars of BTC in order to drive the price much higher are highly unlikely to do so with Saylor anywhere close to his current level of influence.”
Worst call
-1.9%“It’s actually comically straightforward. Sell however many billions of $ of BTC necessary ASAP to take out all the converts and the prefs (yes Saylor can do things near-term that are damaging to these instruments so he can buy them back cheaper; that’s a separate topic). Do the sale in one huge chunk. There are DEF huge buyers of BTC down 20-30% (just guessing where it would get done). Flatten the entire cap structure. No debt no converts no prefs (makes total sense for a business that quite literally does nothing). Then Saylor goes on a media campaign swearing up and down to Satoshi that he is NEVER going to do ANYTHING again. Nothing. Ever. Won’t buy another dollar of BTC. Won’t sell another dollar. Never touch the cap structure again. MSTR will just hold however much BTC they have left after selling a lot to clean up the cap structure. This would pop BTC hard immediately (which is part of the reason you know the BTC sale deal would get done) . And over time, if Saylor does NOTHING, the market will eventually derisk him and his foolishness. And BTC can head much higher (still a big quantum problem and a paper Bitcoin problem but those are separate topics). This is the NO BRAINER right decision for Saylor to make. Right decision for MSTR (which I don’t care about at all) and right decision for BTC (which I care about a lot). I don’t think Saylor will do this though. And I honestly think the main reason he won’t do what is obviously needed is cocaine.”
Every token @Travis_Kling has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 1 token, all time.
Last called 27 Jun 2026 · 4 calls since 24 Jun 2026
2 bullish · 2 bearish
By month resolved · 24 hours horizon
Not enough history in this window for a trend.
All time · 24h
6 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:19 | “NFA. I think BTC has a Saylor problem, a quantum problem and a paper Bitcoin problem. The first two need to be worked through. I don't think there's really anything you can do about #3, but it's def damaging to the value proposition of BTC. I still think the price of BTC can go up a lot even with a paper BTC problem, but it's highly unlikely to "run away" to the upside. Too much paper BTC that can be sold (an infinite amount). Saylor is directionally doing the right things now (eg, selling BTC; not buying any BTC; raising cash; issuing MSTR; not issuing STRC), but he still owns waaaay too much BTC IMO. He has $50bn. He needs to sell at least half that to clean up "the Saylor problem". He's been selling $100mm/week. At that rate, it would take him 5 years of continuous selling to sell half the stack. Not great. Quantum risk preparedness has made progress this year. It's now being taken seriously, which it really wasn't at the beginning of the year. You want to see continued progress being made, and hope there's no big leap in quantum capabilities. That's been the fear in the market since March when Google moved their quantum migration date up to 2029. That was the signal that this is a major issue for BTC. Because what if Google moves it up to 2027?” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @Travis_Kling head to head.
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| — |
| 24h |
| — |
| — |
| unscored |
| 28 Jun 2026, 01:53 | “Yes I agree. People seem to be misjudging the likelihood of adversarial actors in the market. Below is the original tweet this tweet is referencing. My original point was that Saylor put himself in a position where really big money may be playing offense AGAINST him. https://t.co/qmxMx7otMx” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 24h | — | — | unscored |
| 27 Jun 2026, 23:52 | “Yup I get this option. It’s certainly in play and is perhaps the mostly likely outcome. My opinion is that BTC price would struggle under this scenario. It leaves too much Saylor risk in place on BTC. Too many deep pockets wouldn’t have interest in buying a lot of BTC in this scenario.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 24h | — | — | unscored |
| 27 Jun 2026, 22:52 | “@cryptoklotz Yes. The very deep pockets that need to be convinced to buy many billions of dollars of BTC in order to drive the price much higher are highly unlikely to do so with Saylor anywhere close to his current level of influence.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $60,132 | 24h | $58,966 | -1.9% | correct |
| 27 Jun 2026, 22:46 | “It’s actually comically straightforward. Sell however many billions of $ of BTC necessary ASAP to take out all the converts and the prefs (yes Saylor can do things near-term that are damaging to these instruments so he can buy them back cheaper; that’s a separate topic). Do the sale in one huge chunk. There are DEF huge buyers of BTC down 20-30% (just guessing where it would get done). Flatten the entire cap structure. No debt no converts no prefs (makes total sense for a business that quite literally does nothing). Then Saylor goes on a media campaign swearing up and down to Satoshi that he is NEVER going to do ANYTHING again. Nothing. Ever. Won’t buy another dollar of BTC. Won’t sell another dollar. Never touch the cap structure again. MSTR will just hold however much BTC they have left after selling a lot to clean up the cap structure. This would pop BTC hard immediately (which is part of the reason you know the BTC sale deal would get done) . And over time, if Saylor does NOTHING, the market will eventually derisk him and his foolishness. And BTC can head much higher (still a big quantum problem and a paper Bitcoin problem but those are separate topics). This is the NO BRAINER right decision for Saylor to make. Right decision for MSTR (which I don’t care about at all) and right decision for BTC (which I care about a lot). I don’t think Saylor will do this though. And I honestly think the main reason he won’t do what is obviously needed is cocaine.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $60,132 | 24h | $58,966 | -1.9% | incorrect |
| 24 Jun 2026, 17:41 | “It makes intuitive sense to me that there would be a group of sophisticated, deep-pocketed BTC bulls that are currently trying to figure out how to collapse the MSTR cap structure by any means necessary, so as to force a puke of the BTC currently held. Call it the “Soros-ification” of MSTR. There’s a narrow path to successfully execute this, but there are two massive reasons to go for it: 1- if you’re a big BTC bull, you likely know that Saylor in his current position of influence has significantly impaired the value proposition of BTC. So in order for BTC to head a lot higher (new ATH and beyond), the Saylor risk needs to get cleaned up entirely or greatly diminished. And the most likely way that occurs is to get MSTR holding way less BTC (or none). 2- if you pull off the Soros-ification of MSTR (make money on the short) and then flip long on BTC into the lows, the PL will be measured in billions and likely tens of billions.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $59,309 | 24h | $59,580 | +0.5% | correct |
