Loading…
Published 27 Jun 2026, 22:52 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC
Travis Kling
@Travis_Kling
In reply to · 27 Jun 2026, 22:48 UTC · context given to the AI
@Travis_Kling +1 on the same grounds that "you can't reason with someone unreasonable" saylor has the same disposition as adam sandler's character in uncut gems just a chaotic, crackhead gambler archetype@cryptoklotz Yes. The very deep pockets that need to be convinced to buy many billions of dollars of BTC in order to drive the price much higher are highly unlikely to do so with Saylor anywhere close to his current level of influence.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 58966.2 / 60132.1 − 1 = -1.9%d × r = +1.9% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correctOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction