Published 28 Jun 2026, 01:53 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC
Travis Kling
@Travis_Kling
Quoting · 24 Jun 2026, 17:41 UTC · context given to the AI
It makes intuitive sense to me that there would be a group of sophisticated, deep-pocketed BTC bulls that are currently trying to figure out how to collapse the MSTR cap structure by any means necessary, so as to force a puke of the BTC currently held. Call it the “Soros-ification” of MSTR. There’s a narrow path to successfully execute this, but there are two massive reasons to go for it: 1- if you’re a big BTC bull, you likely know that Saylor in his current position of influence has significantly impaired the value proposition of BTC. So in order for BTC to head a lot higher (new ATH and beyond), the Saylor risk needs to get cleaned up entirely or greatly diminished. And the most likely way that occurs is to get MSTR holding way less BTC (or none). 2- if you pull off the Soros-ification of MSTR (make money on the short) and then flip long on BTC into the lows, the PL will be measured in billions and likely tens of billions.In reply to · 28 Jun 2026, 01:41 UTC · context given to the AI
@_Checkmatey_ @Travis_Kling Yeah the only issue is that the rest of the market may try to front run this causing a further BTC price collapse + MSTR shares would likely collapse (but I taking the pain upfront isn’t the worst option).Yes I agree. People seem to be misjudging the likelihood of adversarial actors in the market. Below is the original tweet this tweet is referencing. My original point was that Saylor put himself in a position where really big money may be playing offense AGAINST him. https://t.co/qmxMx7otMxView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction