@CrypNuevo · Unclaimed · Rank #77 (Top 87%) · All time · 4 hours horizon How it’s ranked
Not a bull, not a bear. Just TA. (Liquidity & market psychology). Not Financial Advice @VettedLabs
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
33
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
36.4%
12 correct / 21 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
-0.3%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.3%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
189d
5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+1.0%“There are liquidations on both sides. Although there are more to the downside, the current upside momentum could easily trigger the short liquidations at $83.2k first. Probably short liquidations first, and then we'll analyse if long liquidations could be the next target. https://t.co/ptRQaAQdxK”
Worst call
-2.7%“$BTC update: As analysed yesterday, bearish start of the week. Bias unchanged. It could simply be a move to reset the delta. That would be confirmed if we see $61k holding. Looks a bit fragile so not a good place to risk much capital - ideally price stays above the 4h50EMA.”
Every token @CrypNuevo has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 1 Nov 2026 · 5 calls since 24 Aug 2026
1 bullish · 4 bearish
Last called 1 Nov 2026 · 31 calls since 10 May 2026
21 bullish · 10 bearish
Last called 3 Sept 2026
By month resolved · 4 hours horizon
21 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:27 | “In relation to $ETH, I see a long wick in the 1D time frame. I'd expect it to get filled. So perhaps we could see a push into the 4h50EMA and a new rejection from there. The 4H50EMA is clearly the main resistance for Ethereum at the moment. https://t.co/BPrtN7CY7f” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @CrypNuevo head to head.
All time · 4h
| ETH |
| ▼ Bearish |
| $2,258 |
| 4h |
| $2,267 |
| +0.4% |
| incorrect |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:27 | “We could see a V-recovery but I personally don't see it as likely tbh. So, I'm not betting on that scenario but instead on revisiting the lows again - from there, we could see a W pattern or a 3 taps pattern with a stop hunt. I'm personally not jumping into longs here at $78k. https://t.co/BHiqVamXQM” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $77,723 | 4h | $77,973 | +0.3% | incorrect |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:16 | “I started with the long trigger cause I already mapped them out last week - it doesn't mean I think it's more likely. Market bias is bearish so, in principle, downside continuation should put more pressure this week. For shorts, with BTC.D rising, I'd focus on altcoins and ETH. https://t.co/3tzi21BIuA” | ETH | ▼ Bearish | $2,365 | 4h | $2,389 | +1.0% | incorrect |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:35 | “$BTC update: 50% of the wick filled and nice reaction back above support🔨 Ideally, this keeps pushing up from here and takes the liquidity that it's sitting above those local highs. I'm in and my invalidation is falling below the range highs again - so practically a B/E exit.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $83,919 | 4h | $83,505 | -0.5% | incorrect |
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:59 | “In Ethereum, in my opinion, it's very clear that it needs some more downside because the two main liquidity areas are to the downside. There must be a lot of liquidity right below those local lows. I think it's probably too much liquidity for MMs to ignore - so they'll take it. https://t.co/W3pM90PCz4” | ETH | ▼ Bearish | $2,533 | 4h | $2,534 | +0.0% | incorrect |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:35 | “$BTC Sunday update: Bullish case is in play - retracing the LP that reaches up to $89.3k. It'd make sense to fully retrace it. Personally, I was supporting more the bearish case last week but I was mindful and also ready for this trade as I explained. What's next? 🧵↓(1/5)” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $84,883 | 4h | $84,723 | -0.2% | incorrect |
| 20 Sept 2026, 09:44 | “Looking at the accumulated liquidations, we come to the conclusion that there is a medium risk of a long squeeze. A long squeeze is a move to the downside to hit long liquidations. And this also aligns with having the biggest liquidation levels to the downside. Caution. https://t.co/uQplUeC0vQ” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $80,512 | 4h | $80,529 | +0.0% | incorrect |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:17 | “$BTC update: Nailed the first 48h of price action this week 🔨 I'm expecting a lot of volatility tomorrow during FOMC - price will likely take the local lows imo. I owe a lot of my success to the wick fill strategy. What an amazing trading technique if combined with context!” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $76,853 | 4h | $76,907 | +0.1% | incorrect |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:16 | “Something that concerns me is the FOMC we have on Wednesday. The Fed is likely set to hike 25bps which could lead to some selling in the stock market and Bitcoin would follow. If that's the case, we could first see the upside wick fill as a false move at the start of the week. https://t.co/7thDIlHyVC” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $77,000 | 4h | $77,215 | +0.3% | incorrect |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:37 | “$SOL I'm glad that I didn't share my Solana chart because I was bidding at $58 and price bounced off at $60. Price is now testing the 1W50EMA (strong resistance) and could easily correct a bit into $88-$87. It should take some work and time to get back in the orange range imho https://t.co/3xuYsu0dZF” | SOL | ▼ Bearish | $100.30 | 4h | $101.62 | +1.3% | incorrect |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:07 | “bitcoin:native update: Price tested the 4h50EMA perfectly and filled practically all the downside wick. I think it's quite likely that it goes now towards $81k to fill the long wick to the upside in the 1h time frame. It's an important liquidity imbalance given that the structure holds.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,735 | 4h | $78,015 | -0.9% | incorrect |
| 28 Jul 2026, 11:29 | “$BTC update: Momentum shifted as we analysed on Sunday, and price is moving towards the accumulated liquidity below the trendline - it has already absorbed many stop losses. As always, liquidity is a magnet for price. Btw, most of you agreed in the replies, well done too 👌” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $63,384 | 4h | $63,675 | +0.5% | incorrect |
| 21 Jul 2026, 15:56 | “$BTC update: Great start of the week for Bitcoin as analysed. Bitcoin found acceptance above the 1D50EMA and it's pushing to the upside toward the mid-range ($69k). Let's see if momentum follows and gets there in the next days.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $66,648 | 4h | $66,424 | -0.3% | incorrect |
| 19 Jul 2026, 11:12 | “$BTC Sunday update: Price is following both our HTF and LTF projections. Let's start with LTF: Price is still holding this sideways consolidation movement between the EMAs. This is a liquidity build-up and is likely to trigger a move to the upside next week. 🧵↓(1/5)” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $64,547 | 4h | $64,532 | -0.0% | incorrect |
| 12 Jul 2026, 19:17 | “$BTC Sunday update: Everything is going as projected and I don't see any reason to change bias/position so I'm sticking to the Three Taps Pattern thesis and expecting Bitcoin to trade towards the mid-range at $69k. In fact, I see 2 new arguments supporting this idea: 🧵↓(1/5)” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $64,143 | 4h | $63,759 | -0.6% | incorrect |