Loading profile…
@Krzyszt40559764 · Unclaimed · Rank #83 (Top 94%) · All time · 4 hours horizon How it’s ranked
No risk no porsche HODL.
Coverage 8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
14
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
35.7%
5 correct / 9 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
-0.3%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.3%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
186d
8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+0.8%“@CryptoJelleNL Told ya brah, you just didn’t wanna listen. Nobody wanted BTC at 60k so now y’all chasing higher. You’ll still print, just less. https://t.co/sdr2kd68SK”
Worst call
-1.8%“@CryptoJelleNL https://t.co/0qrjGCTA6C Bitcoin is correlated with IGV, not SPX. We already had a major correction in March, the war in Iran, and nothing really happened - BTC pulled back slightly, but even though markets were weak, it didn’t drop below 60K. Bottom is in”
Every token @Krzyszt40559764 has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 2 tokens, all time.
Last called 30 Oct 2026 · 14 calls since 11 May 2026
12 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 6 Aug 2026
By month resolved · 4 hours horizon
52 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Jun 2026, 19:36 | “@imperial_btc It could be like that, but it looks odd - IGV is rising strongly while Bitcoin is dropping, so they’ve completely decoupled. We’re at a key moment, and if the uptrend is to continue, the declines should stop right here https://t.co/6lDhrMZAsv” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @Krzyszt40559764 head to head.
All time · 4h
| BTC |
| ▼ Bearish |
| — |
| 4h |
| — |
| — |
| unscored |
| 1 Jun 2026, 15:54 | “@Sykodelic_ @RiddleRapt BTC will enter a bull market when stocks start their bear market 🤡” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 22 May 2026, 11:44 | “@bitcoindata21 30–40? What? lol... If you manage to pull that off, respect. I’m aiming for a safer 2.3x from here on BTC.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,245 | 4h | $76,621 | -0.8% | incorrect |
| 22 May 2026, 09:18 | “@imperial_btc Bear market believers will buy back at ATH, expecting 3 year bull cycle. Supercycle believers won’t sell at 170k, waiting for 250k. Both are wrong BTC won’t hit 250k soon, nor will it trend up for the next 3 years. After a move toward 160–200k, a bear market is likely to follow.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 19 May 2026, 15:14 | “@bitcoindata21 https://t.co/cdtIlwsQGN I agree - people never learn from their mistakes, so they’ll turn bullish only at ATHs. This year Bitcoin will do exactly the same thing again.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 15 May 2026, 10:34 | “@CryptoJelleNL https://t.co/0qrjGCTA6C Bitcoin is correlated with IGV, not SPX. We already had a major correction in March, the war in Iran, and nothing really happened - BTC pulled back slightly, but even though markets were weak, it didn’t drop below 60K. Bottom is in” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $80,557 | 4h | $79,092 | -1.8% | incorrect |
| 11 May 2026, 13:06 | “@camelfinance People like you were saying “40k next” when Bitcoin was at 60k sats. The difference now is that you’re waiting for 60k… even though 60k was within reach not long ago. The bottom is probably behind us, so keep waiting, my friend. In the end, you’ll buy back above 100k https://t.co/epY6YfMzDD” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $81,228 | 4h | $81,402 | +0.2% | correct |
