Loading profile…
@Krzyszt40559764 · Unclaimed · Rank #68 (Top 79%) · All time · 30 days horizon How it’s ranked
No risk no porsche HODL.
Coverage 8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
12
2 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
50.0%
6 correct / 6 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
-2.3%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−5.5%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
186d
8 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+28.4%“@GeoMetric_9 ETFs together with Michael Saylor were the main drivers of this bull run. Macro conditions were weak, which is exactly why there was no altseason. Looking ahead to 2027/28, the macro backdrop should improve and things should look solid. BTC +$180K ETH +0,06BTC”
Worst call
-23.4%“@camelfinance People like you were saying “40k next” when Bitcoin was at 60k sats. The difference now is that you’re waiting for 60k… even though 60k was within reach not long ago. The bottom is probably behind us, so keep waiting, my friend. In the end, you’ll buy back above 100k https://t.co/epY6YfMzDD”
Every token @Krzyszt40559764 has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 2 tokens, all time.
Last called 30 Oct 2026 · 14 calls since 11 May 2026
12 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 6 Aug 2026
By month resolved · 30 days horizon
6 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:26 | “@imperial_btc In my opinion this is probably a new cycle. BTC dropped below the 200w MA, and every time it did that it meant a reset and a new cycle. In that situation it’s hard to imagine BTC growing only those 30% from 126k.” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @Krzyszt40559764 head to head.
All time · 30d
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| $76,869 |
| 30d |
| $82,737 |
| +7.6% |
| correct |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:45 | “I’m thinking along similar lines, but more like a 3x. From a ~60k bottom, 3x would put BTC around 180–195k; if I can sell there, I’d be happy with that. Last cycle I was counting on 10x and got unpleasantly surprised. This time I’m being more realistic: 3x, maybe 3.5x, especially since I also hold some ETH. We’ll see” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,424 | 30d | $81,436 | +3.8% | correct |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:06 | “@GeoMetric_9 100k incoming” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $79,906 | 30d | $83,637 | +4.7% | correct |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | “@GeoMetric_9 ETFs together with Michael Saylor were the main drivers of this bull run. Macro conditions were weak, which is exactly why there was no altseason. Looking ahead to 2027/28, the macro backdrop should improve and things should look solid. BTC +$180K ETH +0,06BTC” | ETH | ▲ Bullish | $1,914 | 30d | $2,457 | +28.4% | correct |
| 10 Jul 2026, 10:20 | “@imperial_btc One thing though: I think if this is a new cycle, it will go a bit higher than 160k, probably reach 200k+. We'll see.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $64,355 | 30d | $64,905 | +0.9% | correct |
| 9 Jun 2026, 17:35 | “@karlbooklover A lot of people thought the same at the BTC bottom and bought ETH, expecting it to outperform BTC. It didn't. Will it outperform this time? Maybe. Good luck. I'm sticking with BTC. I think $180k (a 3x move) is very achievable.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $61,638 | 30d | $63,088 | +2.4% | correct |
