Loading profile…
@KillaXBT · Unclaimed · Rank #31 (Top 42%) · 90 days · 30 days horizon How it’s ranked
Quantitative trader, 7 years.
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 11 Nov 2026
Calls
80
28 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
63.7%
51 correct / 29 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+3.2%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.8%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
190d
5 May 2026 – 11 Nov 2026
Best call
+34.9%“I have a small spot $SOL allocation. I’m not particularly bullish on it long term, but I think there’s a good chance we see something like this play out once $BTC starts trending higher again. Personally, I’m targeting a 75–100% move here, nothing too crazy. Patience. https://t.co/OCxR2COmtg https://t.co/uCmZZPe7fq”
Worst call
-25.1%“No surprise so far… $BTC is down 2.8% since FOMC. In 6 of the last 7 cases, we saw average drops of 4-5%. If this reaction mimics the past, we could test the low 60-61K area. Overall, you wouldn't want to see us lose 60K otherwise we will end up sweeping the lows. https://t.co/4EfPJSpNrG https://t.co/ImJMWaTwh9”
Every token @KillaXBT has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 9 Nov 2026 · 245 calls since 5 May 2026
161 bullish · 84 bearish
Last called 2 Nov 2026 · 7 calls since 7 Jun 2026
5 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 17 Oct 2026
By month resolved · 30 days horizon
349 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:19 | “This is the $BTC 2022 bottom formation compared with the current 2026 formation. If we mirror the 2022 structure almost identically, it would suggest that even if BTC retraces from the 68–70K high, we could still hold above the previous lows without actually breaking them. It does seem almost too easy, but at the end of the day, it’s just a pattern, and patterns can always break. But it must feel awful targeting something nearly 25% away this late in the cycle... The only way to validate this fractal/pattern is for BTC to retrace back into the range and show clear exhaustion on the 4H/1D. If there’s no exhaustion and BTC fails to accept back into the range, then the pattern is invalidated.” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @KillaXBT head to head.
90 days · 30d
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| — |
| 30d |
| — |
| — |
| unscored |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:01 | “How are them bears doing...🤣 Slow and steady wins the race. Nailed the $BTC top. Let’s see If I nail the bottom 🪄 https://t.co/WABkVKw3pX https://t.co/d9Mo4jglN0” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:39 | “Imagine watching $BTC push from the lows & having 0 exposure. You’re watching price move higher, but you’re still completely fixated on lower. You don’t know if the bottom is in, so you sit there waiting patiently, hoping for a level that could come, but might never come. That’s the problem with trying to time perfection in an imperfect market. Couldn’t be me. I’d rather be exposed early & sit in draw down. The cycles are shifting, and there are plenty of metrics that support that. Eventually, the traditional 4 year cycle will change, and I don’t want to be sidelined simply because I was too stubborn. I’ll happily buy at 70K, 65K, 60K, 55K, whatever. In the grand scheme of things, we are going to 150K+ Because ask yourself this... What if the price you’re waiting for never comes? What’s the plan then? Stay sidelined? Keep waiting? Short the entire move up because you’re convinced your target has to hit? Personally, I’d rather be exposed and adjust along the way than watch the move happen without me.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:13 | “I have a small spot $SOL allocation. I’m not particularly bullish on it long term, but I think there’s a good chance we see something like this play out once $BTC starts trending higher again. Personally, I’m targeting a 75–100% move here, nothing too crazy. Patience. https://t.co/OCxR2COmtg https://t.co/uCmZZPe7fq” | SOL | ▲ Bullish | $78.35 | 30d | $105.68 | +34.9% | correct |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:37 | “They can’t regulate Bitcoin, so they’re trying to buy it all. They orchestrate the dips, shake the weak hands out, scoop up their coins, and steadily accumulate more of the supply. The less $BTC left in the hands of ordinary people, the more concentrated and trackable the ownership becomes. And the beauty of it? The scarcer the supply gets, the higher the price has to go. ✌️” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $64,395 | 30d | $78,221 | +21.5% | correct |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:51 | “$BTC We've been consolidating above 61K for nearly two months, yet the market is still heavily positioned for a move to 50K. Keep lowering your targets if you want. Just don't trade what you want to see. https://t.co/cYG6LApBvk https://t.co/Q2B2pD9Zia” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:14 | “A bull will always end up making more money than a smart bear. Just remember that… $BTC” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:29 | “$BTC Funny enough, it seems like shorts have been squeezed throughout this entire move. I’ve mentioned numerous times to either keep shorts small or avoid shorting altogether, because a year from now, shorting these areas is going to look pretty stupid. https://t.co/DARFOLBUU1 https://t.co/bjsaUD3CUe” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:40 | “$BTC Structurally, we need to reclaim the 65K region. Right now, BTC is rejecting and compressing below it. If we fail to flip 65K, the probability of testing the weekly open at 62.8K increases. Lose the weekly open, and 61.8K–61.3K becomes likely. https://t.co/GH042a3B7U” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $63,829 | 30d | $75,638 | +18.5% | incorrect |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:32 | “Little note: Monday highs are for scalps only (1-2%) then close. You look around London/NY for the first high to establish itself.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 16 Aug 2026, 11:46 | “Monday has not particularly been a good day for $BTC at all. 10/10 times in this range, you could’ve looked to short Monday high & won every time. The wick usually forms during Asia, London, or NY, and with structural confirmation would’ve caught a 2.5%+ drop every time. https://t.co/rF1ihQK16p” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $62,945 | 30d | $76,896 | +22.2% | incorrect |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:20 | “We have 50 days left of this $BTC bear market. https://t.co/hoagjBMnnz” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:40 | “Very important post... $BTC I have only ever wrote 1 article. This is the most important strategy I have deployed on sub-accounts seperate from my 2X swing long position. Utilizing leverage the same way insituions trade. We already dropped -54%. Realistically speaking, the most we can see is 65-68% based on the math. Meaning, if you long with 10x leverage, you have roughly 3 entries to nail the bottom. This is how you properly utilize leverage in conditions like this, especially after a major retracement & limited downside. Theoretically, what I am saying is that if you longed on 10x, you would catch the bottom in 3 tries from here, maybe less depending on how far we extend. Just do the math. 1st: 62.6 entry > 57.1 liquidation > 10x leverage > 10K margin > total PnL at 126K = 101.3K 2nd: 57.1 entry > 51.6 liquidation > 10x leverage > 10K margin > total PnL at 126K = 120,665 3rd: 51.6 entry > 46.1 liquidation > 10x leverage > 10K margin > total PnL at 126K = 144,186 The strategy is simple: utilizing leverage in a way similar to how institutions manage exposure. We’ve already experienced a 54% drawdown. Based on the math, a realistic worst-case scenario would put the decline around 65–68%. At 10x leverage, each position has roughly 9.5% downside from entry before liquidation with maintenance margin. In theory, that means you could potentially structure 3 separate 10x long entries from here, allowing each liquidation level to act as the trigger for the next entry. The PNL from the final entry would more than offset the losses from the first two if they’re invalidated. You can structure this across 4–5 entries, which is exactly what I’m doing alongside my 2X long, to give myself multiple shots at catching the bottom instead of trying to predict it perfectly. So, simply put: I’m fully allocated in spot, running a 2x swing long from $62.6K, and I’ve also deployed this strategy across sub-accounts.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $62,986 | 30d | $77,659 | +23.3% | correct |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:49 | “For those who aren’t positioned yet: If you’re waiting for Q4, this is the plan and expectations. Any sweep below the 57K wick low, if we get one, should be bought up very aggressively and almost instantly. I don’t expect us to spend much time trading around these levels. In a low liquidity environment, whales are likely to use other people’s liquidations as an opportunity to accumulate large positions while most participants are dead. So, if we do get a sweep below 57K during Q4, I believe there’s a high probability that it becomes the bottoming wick. Key word: IF. By now, it should be pretty obvious that I expect $BTC to be above 80K in Q1 next year. With BTC currently around 62.8K, that presents a significant move to capture, especially with leverage. We still have a couple of weeks before Q4 approaches, so for those who aren’t currently exposed or positioned, my advice would be to start preparing accordingly and look to build exposure on any sweeps into these levels. Personally, I don’t feel the need to clarify every post, but for transparency: I’m already in my long and spot position, with a 65.8K notional average. As always, the 57K sweep is a conditional scenario, not a prediction that it must happen.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:55 | “It seems like $BTC is going for the 61K liquidations. Worth watching, because if we lose that area, the structure doesn’t look particularly great, and we could see a sweep below the 57s. As mentioned in previous posts, MMs will sometimes front run major short liquidations to make people overconfident in their shorts, just as the market is actually shifting into a new trend. Right now, it looks like we’re in more of a long hunting phase of the cycle.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $63,071 | 30d | $77,257 | +22.5% | incorrect |
