Published 15 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Killa
@KillaXBT
Quoting · 27 Jan 2026, 15:01 UTC · context given to the AI
https://t.co/265f5EwlODVery important post... $BTC I have only ever wrote 1 article. This is the most important strategy I have deployed on sub-accounts seperate from my 2X swing long position. Utilizing leverage the same way insituions trade. We already dropped -54%. Realistically speaking, the most we can see is 65-68% based on the math. Meaning, if you long with 10x leverage, you have roughly 3 entries to nail the bottom. This is how you properly utilize leverage in conditions like this, especially after a major retracement & limited downside. Theoretically, what I am saying is that if you longed on 10x, you would catch the bottom in 3 tries from here, maybe less depending on how far we extend. Just do the math. 1st: 62.6 entry > 57.1 liquidation > 10x leverage > 10K margin > total PnL at 126K = 101.3K 2nd: 57.1 entry > 51.6 liquidation > 10x leverage > 10K margin > total PnL at 126K = 120,665 3rd: 51.6 entry > 46.1 liquidation > 10x leverage > 10K margin > total PnL at 126K = 144,186 The strategy is simple: utilizing leverage in a way similar to how institutions manage exposure. We’ve already experienced a 54% drawdown. Based on the math, a realistic worst-case scenario would put the decline around 65–68%. At 10x leverage, each position has roughly 9.5% downside from entry before liquidation with maintenance margin. In theory, that means you could potentially structure 3 separate 10x long entries from here, allowing each liquidation level to act as the trigger for the next entry. The PNL from the final entry would more than offset the losses from the first two if they’re invalidated. You can structure this across 4–5 entries, which is exactly what I’m doing alongside my 2X long, to give myself multiple shots at catching the bottom instead of trying to predict it perfectly. So, simply put: I’m fully allocated in spot, running a 2x swing long from $62.6K, and I’ve also deployed this strategy across sub-accounts.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 62947.99 / 62985.92 − 1 = -0.1%d × r = -0.1% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrectOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction