Loading profile…
@KillaXBT · Unclaimed · Rank #32 (Top 44%) · 90 days · 30 days horizon How it’s ranked
Quantitative trader, 7 years.
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
81
28 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
63.0%
51 correct / 30 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+3.1%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.8%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
189d
5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+34.9%“I have a small spot $SOL allocation. I’m not particularly bullish on it long term, but I think there’s a good chance we see something like this play out once $BTC starts trending higher again. Personally, I’m targeting a 75–100% move here, nothing too crazy. Patience. https://t.co/OCxR2COmtg https://t.co/uCmZZPe7fq”
Worst call
-25.1%“No surprise so far… $BTC is down 2.8% since FOMC. In 6 of the last 7 cases, we saw average drops of 4-5%. If this reaction mimics the past, we could test the low 60-61K area. Overall, you wouldn't want to see us lose 60K otherwise we will end up sweeping the lows. https://t.co/4EfPJSpNrG https://t.co/ImJMWaTwh9”
Every token @KillaXBT has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 9 Nov 2026 · 245 calls since 5 May 2026
161 bullish · 84 bearish
Last called 2 Nov 2026 · 7 calls since 7 Jun 2026
5 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 17 Oct 2026
By month resolved · 30 days horizon
350 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 20:01 | “$BTC Overall, the plan has played out very nicely. Breaking out from accumulation, consolidating below the previous highs, then expanding into the next target. Aside from 89.2K to 90.6K being a nice LTF area where we could see a rejection, the ideal extension for this leg sits around 92K to 94K. If this is a genuine impulse breakout and we are transitioning into a higher range, I would expect momentum to continue rather than see a new range form here. The market should capitalise on the momentum and push higher. The timing has been quicker than expected, but I will happily take it given I am already positioned for the move.” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @KillaXBT head to head.
90 days · 30d
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| $84,532 |
| 30d |
| $80,671 |
| -4.6% |
| incorrect |
| 27 Sept 2026, 17:12 | “When in doubt, zoom the fuck out. Once the 50/100 on the weekly flips, you simply long. Scalp shorting these lower regions look ridiculous when you zoom out. Imagine looking back in 1-2 years, with $BTC at 160K, and realizing you were shorting here. It will be a sight for sore eyes. I’ll be riding the move higher with long exposure + spot exposure, and I’m confident I’ll outperform 99% by doing less.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 27 Sept 2026, 12:56 | “We only dropped 53% this bear cycle. So you see them 25-30% corrections we saw in previous bull cycles? They are not happening. Volatility compression. Study. That my friends is a thing of the past. What makes me laugh is seeing people compare 2014 or 2018 to now. $BTC was a few billion dollar asset back then, today it sits at roughly a 1.5T market cap. You cannot compare an asset that has dynamically shifted to this extent. It’s like comparing a small cap stock to a global mega cap and expecting identical behaviour. Retardio if you ask me. Want actual valuable advice? You are not getting anything more than a 15% drop to enter your longs all the way upto 126K. Dynamics change, people unfortunately don't.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:19 | “The range is higher, not lower... $BTC People are not ready. https://t.co/jN8UMOcNei” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:37 | “We have just 10 days left of this $BTC bear market. You already know my view, but when comparing prior cycles, the cycle low is effectively confirmed unless BTC somehow nukes below 57K within the next 10 days. Each bear market cycle lasts 365 days. We are on 355. Its done. https://t.co/9raMqSI7II https://t.co/gWsBDQIAuR” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $83,995 | 30d | $79,859 | -4.9% | incorrect |
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:31 | “Speaking from a lot of experience here... I have seen it all. It happens every single cycle, all the time. "It needs to have a healthy correction." "It needs to take liquidity below." I can assure you, it doesn’t. It does not need to do anything. It does not need a "healthy" correction, and it certainly does not need to take liquidity below us either. People always bring this up when the market is simply in disbelief. And it is clear that is precisely where we are now: disbelief. The only thing people want now is a good retracement, a solid retest, and then they will happily "long," so to speak. Well unfortunately for you, that is not an inherent characteristic of how a bull market is designed to function, especially given we are still way below 126K. The entire rally to 126K should be violent and relatively quick. You will not get ideal retraces. You will not get ideal retests. The market is not going to give you that luxury, hence why positioning beforehand is always smartest. The market does not feel sorry for you & it does not owe you anything. Because now, if you are sidelined, their are only 2 things you are doing: 1.) Trying to rationalise or justify why it needs to retrace to fill your long. 2.) Shorting in hopes it retests your level out of spite, just to be in the market. A mistake which, again, 90% of people make. Longs from below end up closing too soon. 60K longers? Most probably closed already. 76K longers? Same thing. You might think the market is heavily long just because it pushed up 50% from the lows, but you are not factoring in how the market naturally rebalances itself when people take profits too soon. Especially after being down only for 10 months. You do not use your brain in a bull market. You bid pullbacks. That is it. It is that simple. Yet the simplest things are the hardest for people to follow because they cannot accept that it can be that easy, when it literally is that easy. So my advice is to completely ignore people like this. There is a good chance they hold zero $BTC and are simply reacting out of spite for missing the move. The market can go up only. Just look at the weekly and monthly TFs through previous bull cycles up to new ATHs. It is pretty much up only, so there is no reason to assume this time will be different.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:56 | “It quite literally can only go up only... $BTC People are overcomplicating something very simple because, if it looks too obvious, it cannot happen. We’ve formed a weekly HH while positioning has fully reset. There is quite literally nothing to be bearish about. https://t.co/yMtwy4afSe” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $84,015 | 30d | $80,273 | -4.5% | incorrect |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:22 | “Monthly open pivot approaching. 6/7 times, $BTC has seen a pump around the monthly open, usually because PA was bearish heading into it. So if we dump into October, I’d expect a push higher afterwards. If we pump into it instead, I’d be far more cautious. https://t.co/iZj9rtMSMi” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:23 | “We are never seeing $50K again. We are never seeing $60K again. You would be lucky to even see sub $70K again. Every single time $BTC has created a new weekly high, the trend shifted. Why assume this time will be any different? https://t.co/QP96f0gmTe https://t.co/i54xoTdNiE” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $83,762 | 30d | $80,681 | -3.7% | correct |
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:49 | “The real questions you should be asking yourself is: (1) Who has been rekt? (2) Which positions have been closed? (3) What is the prevailing trend? (4) Is positioning actually overheated? Once you reach the relevant conclusion: Late longs have been flushed. Leveraged longs have capitulated. Positioning has been reset. The HTF trend remains bullish. All whilst we are still holding above the prior weekly range highs after 3 weeks of consolidation below 83K. So, I ask myself: if I were an institution deploying billions, would you look at current sentiment and conclude that the market is overcrowded long? Because with all of these metrics aligning, it appears most people are still underexposed and hesitant to take the initiative to build positions. Most are not positioned. This is infact, a fact, based on metrics. The entire leverage dynamic has reset, regardless of what people are saying. Meanwhile, trend remains bullish. Where is maximum pain from here? Is it really lower, when the positions that needed flushing have already been flushed? Is another move down even going to hurt people if leverage has already been cleared out? Not to mention, 90% of people never caught the move to 87K in the first place. I beg to differ... $BTC” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:34 | “I think alot of people are not ready for how quickly this cycle is going to progress. Unfortunately, my point is being proven. The cycles are speeding up, this has been my inveitable theory that over time, $BTC will become more like a indicy asset with minimal downside volatility. Bottoming at 54% is a very telling sign that its happening sooner & I can almost assure you we will 100% form new ATH's before halvings. I think halving bull years might slowly progressively develop into a thing of the past. As in the end, all that matters is liquidity. So, don't be surprised when you see BTC defy everyones logic, it has to do this, it has to do that, because it most certainly doesnt. And that is the main reason why I postioned early, ahead, and so far its worked out perfectly as anticipated.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:41 | “I’ve decided to move my $BTC hedge short entry to 93.6K. Will it take time to reach? More than likely. But based on the current structure, it is the only HTF area I am watching. If price reaches my region, I plan to hedge 100% of my exposure, including spot, continuation longs, and swing longs,with invalidation around 99-100K. From there, I’d be targeting a 10–15% correction. If developing price action gives me reason to adjust the plan or entry, I’ll update you all, but for now, these are the limits I have in place.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:27 | “It’s not a matter of if, but when. $BTC is not going back to $60K. Bear market bottoms almost always front run major liquidity. The most likely scenario is that we eventually take the liquidity above after plenty of hunts designed to make everyone shit themselves first. https://t.co/W8mjQc14al” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $84,360 | 30d | $80,409 | -4.7% | incorrect |
| 24 Sept 2026, 17:05 | “$BTC Every swing trade I’ve shared over the past 360+ days has played out exactly as planned. My next swing short is positioned in the $89–92K region, with invalidation above $96K. I’ll wait patiently for price to reach my level, then execute. I’m not interested in trying to catch every small move up and down. I’m focused on the cleaner 10–30% moves.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $84,091 | 30d | $80,167 | -4.7% | correct |
| 24 Sept 2026, 15:26 | “The sooner you accept the bottom is in, the better $BTC https://t.co/RHEWkhFAFm” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 30d | — | — | unscored |
