Published 25 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Killa
@KillaXBT
Quoting · 24 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC · context given to the AI
I find this pretty insane. Open interest has completely flushed back to the same levels we saw when $BTC was trading at 76K, yet price is at 84K. To me, that looks extremely healthy. https://t.co/xBxguu5Sz9The real questions you should be asking yourself is: (1) Who has been rekt? (2) Which positions have been closed? (3) What is the prevailing trend? (4) Is positioning actually overheated? Once you reach the relevant conclusion: Late longs have been flushed. Leveraged longs have capitulated. Positioning has been reset. The HTF trend remains bullish. All whilst we are still holding above the prior weekly range highs after 3 weeks of consolidation below 83K. So, I ask myself: if I were an institution deploying billions, would you look at current sentiment and conclude that the market is overcrowded long? Because with all of these metrics aligning, it appears most people are still underexposed and hesitant to take the initiative to build positions. Most are not positioned. This is infact, a fact, based on metrics. The entire leverage dynamic has reset, regardless of what people are saying. Meanwhile, trend remains bullish. Where is maximum pain from here? Is it really lower, when the positions that needed flushing have already been flushed? Is another move down even going to hurt people if leverage has already been cleared out? Not to mention, 90% of people never caught the move to 87K in the first place. I beg to differ... $BTCView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction