Loading profile…
@CrypNuevo · Unclaimed · Rank #69 (Top 91%) · 90 days · 24 hours horizon How it’s ranked
Not a bull, not a bear. Just TA. (Liquidity & market psychology). Not Financial Advice @VettedLabs
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
20
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
45.0%
9 correct / 11 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
-0.7%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.7%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
189d
5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+1.9%“The first thing I notice on the chart is this long wick from Friday. It's a long wick in both directions: • Downside wick: 50% filled ✅ • Upside wick: still a target and will likely get filled next https://t.co/v7xSCypCKU”
Worst call
-5.2%“Looking at the accumulated liquidations, we come to the conclusion that there is a medium risk of a long squeeze. A long squeeze is a move to the downside to hit long liquidations. And this also aligns with having the biggest liquidation levels to the downside. Caution. https://t.co/uQplUeC0vQ”
Every token @CrypNuevo has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 1 Nov 2026 · 5 calls since 24 Aug 2026
1 bullish · 4 bearish
Last called 1 Nov 2026 · 31 calls since 10 May 2026
21 bullish · 10 bearish
Last called 3 Sept 2026
By month resolved · 24 hours horizon
35 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:59 | “$BTC Sunday update: These are the liquidity areas I see in Bitcoin right now: It would surprise me a lot if we don't eventually hit both boxes. So my idea here is to wait for a reaction after hitting one zone and just trade the second move. Let me explain: 🧵↓(1/5)” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @CrypNuevo head to head.
90 days · 24h
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| — |
| 24h |
| — |
| — |
| unscored |
| 4 Oct 2026, 08:45 | “This is the projection from last week: So far it's going really well so I'm still supporting it. We had a little deviation below the previous high to hit stop losses, then tested it as support many times and, now, price seems to be moving towards retracing that LP. https://t.co/BU6acKArgl” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $85,094 | 24h | $86,191 | +1.3% | correct |
| 4 Oct 2026, 08:45 | “$BTC Sunday update: Bitcoin is moving OK and seems pretty stable so we think it's still working on retracing that Liquidity Pool (LP). Not that much has changed since last week but there are a few interesting ideas about this Price Action: 🧵↓(1/5)” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 24h | — | — | unscored |
| 29 Sept 2026, 06:30 | “$BTC before and after of both Price Action and Liquidations analyses since the Sunday update: So far, it's going well. They took the stop-losses below the local support and we could be seeing the start of the new push to +$85k. We can see more liquidations at $85.3k now 👀” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $83,976 | 24h | $83,006 | -1.2% | incorrect |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:35 | “In the short term, I'd like to see a push higher to continue retracing that LP. We're testing the previous high as local support which is a good sign but in these cases, from a liquidity perspective, it would make more sense to sweep the stop losses below it before going higher. https://t.co/mEQXSbpNMN” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 24h | — | — | unscored |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:35 | “$BTC Sunday update: Bullish case is in play - retracing the LP that reaches up to $89.3k. It'd make sense to fully retrace it. Personally, I was supporting more the bearish case last week but I was mindful and also ready for this trade as I explained. What's next? 🧵↓(1/5)” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $84,862 | 24h | $82,909 | -2.3% | incorrect |
| 20 Sept 2026, 09:44 | “Looking at the accumulated liquidations, we come to the conclusion that there is a medium risk of a long squeeze. A long squeeze is a move to the downside to hit long liquidations. And this also aligns with having the biggest liquidation levels to the downside. Caution. https://t.co/uQplUeC0vQ” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $80,430 | 24h | $84,636 | +5.2% | incorrect |
| 20 Sept 2026, 09:44 | “$BTC Sunday update: Another push to the highs but not been able to break through resistance. For now, I see the same as in previous attempts: a green high-volume candle that probably doesn't mean "buy pressure" but "building short positions". And there is more... 🧵↓(1/6)” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 24h | — | — | unscored |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:17 | “$BTC update: Nailed the first 48h of price action this week 🔨 I'm expecting a lot of volatility tomorrow during FOMC - price will likely take the local lows imo. I owe a lot of my success to the wick fill strategy. What an amazing trading technique if combined with context!” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $76,947 | 24h | $75,924 | -1.3% | correct |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:16 | “Something that concerns me is the FOMC we have on Wednesday. The Fed is likely set to hike 25bps which could lead to some selling in the stock market and Bitcoin would follow. If that's the case, we could first see the upside wick fill as a false move at the start of the week. https://t.co/7thDIlHyVC” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $77,105 | 24h | $78,552 | +1.9% | incorrect |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:16 | “The first thing I notice on the chart is this long wick from Friday. It's a long wick in both directions: • Downside wick: 50% filled ✅ • Upside wick: still a target and will likely get filled next https://t.co/v7xSCypCKU” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $77,105 | 24h | $78,552 | +1.9% | correct |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:33 | “$BTC update: It happened yesterday again. Another green high-volume candle into the $80k resistance. It's the 4th time in 3 weeks. What could this sign mean? In my opinion, it's not buying, it's actually selling. For someone to buy, someone needs to sell. There can't be a buyer without a seller. So who is really in control here? I could be wrong but previous cases over the last years have tought me that seeing multiple big green candles with volume into resistance getting rejected almost inmediately is likely a sign that the MMs are building a short position. That's why you see buying (or selling really 😉) at the highest level of the chart. We'll talk tomorrow in the BTC Sunday update more about this and about that long wick and what I think it's likely going to happen next. Have a nice weekend❤️” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $77,336 | 24h | $76,766 | -0.7% | correct |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:32 | “Bullish scenario: This is the scenario that I shared last week and we saw the drop to the box and then the push above range highs to fill the 1h wick. All good for now, but is there enough momentum to breakout from here? It doesn't seem so, and September is usually a bad month. https://t.co/nChBhxKjMq” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 24h | — | — | unscored |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:37 | “$SOL I'm glad that I didn't share my Solana chart because I was bidding at $58 and price bounced off at $60. Price is now testing the 1W50EMA (strong resistance) and could easily correct a bit into $88-$87. It should take some work and time to get back in the orange range imho https://t.co/3xuYsu0dZF” | SOL | ▼ Bearish | $100.11 | 24h | $104.03 | +3.9% | incorrect |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:05 | “$GOLD / $XAU update: I really like how Gold looks into EOY and 2027 - I personally think it'll go up to $6,000. I see a huge global structural demand for Gold. In short time frame, it's interesting that there are two solid supports with just -1.7% distance between each other.” | $XAU | ▲ Bullish | — | 24h | — | — | unscored |
