@CrypNuevo · Unclaimed · Rank #40 (Top 53%) · 90 days · 1 hour horizon How it’s ranked
Not a bull, not a bear. Just TA. (Liquidity & market psychology). Not Financial Advice @VettedLabs
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
20
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
50.0%
10 correct / 10 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+0.0%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.0%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
189d
5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+1.0%“I started with the long trigger cause I already mapped them out last week - it doesn't mean I think it's more likely. Market bias is bearish so, in principle, downside continuation should put more pressure this week. For shorts, with BTC.D rising, I'd focus on altcoins and ETH. https://t.co/3tzi21BIuA”
Worst call
-0.6%“In Ethereum, in my opinion, it's very clear that it needs some more downside because the two main liquidity areas are to the downside. There must be a lot of liquidity right below those local lows. I think it's probably too much liquidity for MMs to ignore - so they'll take it. https://t.co/W3pM90PCz4”
Every token @CrypNuevo has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 1 Nov 2026 · 5 calls since 24 Aug 2026
1 bullish · 4 bearish
Last called 1 Nov 2026 · 31 calls since 10 May 2026
21 bullish · 10 bearish
Last called 3 Sept 2026
By month resolved · 1 hour horizon
10 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:27 | “In relation to $ETH, I see a long wick in the 1D time frame. I'd expect it to get filled. So perhaps we could see a push into the 4h50EMA and a new rejection from there. The 4H50EMA is clearly the main resistance for Ethereum at the moment. https://t.co/BPrtN7CY7f” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @CrypNuevo head to head.
90 days · 1h
| ETH |
| ▼ Bearish |
| $2,258 |
| 1h |
| $2,263 |
| +0.2% |
| incorrect |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:27 | “We could see a V-recovery but I personally don't see it as likely tbh. So, I'm not betting on that scenario but instead on revisiting the lows again - from there, we could see a W pattern or a 3 taps pattern with a stop hunt. I'm personally not jumping into longs here at $78k. https://t.co/BHiqVamXQM” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $77,723 | 1h | $77,844 | +0.2% | incorrect |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:29 | “$BTC update: (2) entry set up successfully so these are my 2 TP orders. Invalidation (SL) is losing the 4H50EMA. Logic says that price should probably attempt to push higher and take the liquidity above those two areas. META and TSLA earnings after market close are crucial.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $83,497 | 1h | $83,202 | -0.4% | incorrect |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:35 | “$BTC update: 50% of the wick filled and nice reaction back above support🔨 Ideally, this keeps pushing up from here and takes the liquidity that it's sitting above those local highs. I'm in and my invalidation is falling below the range highs again - so practically a B/E exit.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $83,919 | 1h | $83,674 | -0.3% | incorrect |
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:59 | “In Ethereum, in my opinion, it's very clear that it needs some more downside because the two main liquidity areas are to the downside. There must be a lot of liquidity right below those local lows. I think it's probably too much liquidity for MMs to ignore - so they'll take it. https://t.co/W3pM90PCz4” | ETH | ▼ Bearish | $2,533 | 1h | $2,548 | +0.6% | incorrect |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:35 | “$BTC Sunday update: Bullish case is in play - retracing the LP that reaches up to $89.3k. It'd make sense to fully retrace it. Personally, I was supporting more the bearish case last week but I was mindful and also ready for this trade as I explained. What's next? 🧵↓(1/5)” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $84,883 | 1h | $84,848 | -0.0% | incorrect |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:17 | “$BTC update: Nailed the first 48h of price action this week 🔨 I'm expecting a lot of volatility tomorrow during FOMC - price will likely take the local lows imo. I owe a lot of my success to the wick fill strategy. What an amazing trading technique if combined with context!” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $76,853 | 1h | $76,946 | +0.1% | incorrect |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:16 | “Something that concerns me is the FOMC we have on Wednesday. The Fed is likely set to hike 25bps which could lead to some selling in the stock market and Bitcoin would follow. If that's the case, we could first see the upside wick fill as a false move at the start of the week. https://t.co/7thDIlHyVC” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $77,000 | 1h | $77,198 | +0.3% | incorrect |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:33 | “$BTC update: It happened yesterday again. Another green high-volume candle into the $80k resistance. It's the 4th time in 3 weeks. What could this sign mean? In my opinion, it's not buying, it's actually selling. For someone to buy, someone needs to sell. There can't be a buyer without a seller. So who is really in control here? I could be wrong but previous cases over the last years have tought me that seeing multiple big green candles with volume into resistance getting rejected almost inmediately is likely a sign that the MMs are building a short position. That's why you see buying (or selling really 😉) at the highest level of the chart. We'll talk tomorrow in the BTC Sunday update more about this and about that long wick and what I think it's likely going to happen next. Have a nice weekend❤️” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $77,330 | 1h | $77,333 | +0.0% | incorrect |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:07 | “bitcoin:native update: Price tested the 4h50EMA perfectly and filled practically all the downside wick. I think it's quite likely that it goes now towards $81k to fill the long wick to the upside in the 1h time frame. It's an important liquidity imbalance given that the structure holds.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,735 | 1h | $78,370 | -0.5% | incorrect |