@TedPillows · Unclaimed · Rank #41 (Top 46%) · All time · 4 hours horizon How it’s ranked
Survived 2 crypto cycles. Turning Bitcoin and Ethereum, on-chain data and macro signals into actionable trades. Research: ↓
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 11 Nov 2026
Calls
263
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
50.2%
132 correct / 131 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+0.0%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.0%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
190d
5 May 2026 – 11 Nov 2026
Best call
+4.3%“Bitcoin below $80,000 is bearish. Bulls need to reclaim this level and close the week above it. https://t.co/BT4wixjT31”
Worst call
-2.9%“Bitcoin falls under $65,000. At 64k there is a lot of liquidity. Should bounce there.”
Every token @TedPillows has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 10 Nov 2026 · 208 calls since 5 May 2026
66 bullish · 142 bearish
Last called 10 Nov 2026 · 130 calls since 7 May 2026
59 bullish · 71 bearish
Last called 2 Nov 2026 · 11 calls since 8 May 2026
5 bullish · 6 bearish
By month resolved · 4 hours horizon
798 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jul 2026, 15:41 | “Spot is supporting the current $BTC move. The initial pump was also due to shorts being liquidated, and now fresh longs are entering. As long as spot demand is there, the momentum could continue. https://t.co/V4Uj6eQNGM” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @TedPillows head to head.
All time · 4h
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| — |
| 4h |
| — |
| — |
| unscored |
| 1 Jul 2026, 10:43 | “Some people said $BTC could not go below $60,000. Look how weak it is.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 1 Jul 2026, 10:18 | “$BTC has failed to reclaim the Feb lows. Sellers are still dominating, while Coinbase Bitcoin Premium is at its lowest level this cycle. If Bitcoin loses the $57,000-$58,000 zone, there's nothing stopping it from going into the low 50s. https://t.co/1TPPXGul14 https://t.co/oryVX0JsAb” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 1 Jul 2026, 08:50 | “$ETH is holding better than $BTC now. Bitcoin hit a new yearly low, while Ethereum held above the $1,550 level. But ETH still isn't out of danger yet. Until Ethereum reclaims the $1,700 level, the chances of a new low will go up. https://t.co/K8o2Fh89js” | ETH | ▼ Bearish | $1,572 | 4h | $1,565 | -0.4% | correct |
| 1 Jul 2026, 08:29 | “$BTC hit a new yearly low. As long as Bitcoin stays below $60,000, sellers are in control. https://t.co/i59mAJdfQ0” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 1 Jul 2026, 06:47 | “$BTC is sitting around $58-59k and the structure remains bearish. Trading below every major moving average. RSI around 30, approaching oversold. June closed down ~19%, despite historically being one of BTC's strongest months. The bigger story is ETF flows. Spot Bitcoin ETFs posted roughly $4B in net outflows during June, the largest monthly outflow on record. That's institutional money leaving the market, not retail panic. Capital also appears to be rotating into semiconductors. Bitcoin ETFs saw roughly $12B in outflows, while semiconductor ETFs attracted around $20B. Key levels: $55,298 = critical 0.5 Fib support. Lose that, and $52k/$48k come into focus, with a measured move pointing toward ~$42k. Bulls need to reclaim the 20D EMA at $62,450, followed by $64k resistance. If $58k breaks, $55k is likely next. Above $62.5k is where the technical structure finally starts to improve.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $58,594 | 4h | $58,596 | +0.0% | incorrect |
| 30 Jun 2026, 15:57 | “$98,600,000 in $BTC buy orders have been placed at $58,000 level. Last level for buyers to defend, or else Bitcoin will drop to $55,000. https://t.co/X9XvNOFel8” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 30 Jun 2026, 14:55 | “Coinbase Institutions Routine: Wake Up Dump loads of $BTC Push Bitcoin to new lows Go to bed Repeat https://t.co/0pYArvbkJY” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 30 Jun 2026, 09:02 | “$ETH is back into its high demand zone. As long as the $1,500 level holds, Ethereum could have a relief rally next month. https://t.co/aZAB5kt6Ez” | ETH | ▲ Bullish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 30 Jun 2026, 08:45 | “$BTC tried to reclaim the $60,000 level but failed. The key level for Bitcoin here is $58,000-$59,000 which should hold for any bounceback. https://t.co/Ipk5BROMZr” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 29 Jun 2026, 18:26 | “$ETH spot demand has been in an uptrend since last week. Looks good in the short-term. https://t.co/0jFumk53uo” | ETH | ▲ Bullish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 29 Jun 2026, 17:21 | “$BTC had its first weekly close below $60,000 in almost 2 years. ETFs are selling, and Strategy is about to sell too. IMO, Bitcoin to $50,000 is highly likely to happen before a pump to $100,000. https://t.co/bAAOAI9hFZ https://t.co/81vbp9iVqY” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 29 Jun 2026, 15:50 | “Michael Saylor will eventually sell more $BTC. If the size is significant enough, expect peak FUD to hit the market and a sharp capitulation wick to follow. https://t.co/SiPKDMeuZB” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unscored |
| 29 Jun 2026, 13:44 | “2022: Do Kwon used UST to accumulate bitcoin:native Later, they dumped BTC to save UST. 2026: Saylor used $STRC to accumulate BTC Now, they are about to dump BTC to save STRC. History never repeats itself, but it often rhymes.” | $STRC | ▼ Bearish | — | 4h | — | — | unresolved |
| 29 Jun 2026, 13:44 | “2022: Do Kwon used UST to accumulate bitcoin:native Later, they dumped BTC to save UST. 2026: Saylor used $STRC to accumulate BTC Now, they are about to dump BTC to save STRC. History never repeats itself, but it often rhymes.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $59,345 | 4h | $60,523 | +2.0% | incorrect |