Loading…
@100trillionUSD · All models are wrong, some are useful. DYOR! 👉 https://t.co/4UQOQ8eRA3
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 21 Oct 2026
Caller Score
25
Top 75% · #17 of 22 ranked
Scored calls
15
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
40.0%
6 correct / 9 incorrect · 0 neutral
Avg 24h return / call
+0.26%
Avg return per call (24 hour horizon)
Following every call
+3.9%
Equal stake on all 15 calls resolved so far
Mean alpha
+0.31%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (52) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 20% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 41.3% | 24 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −6.8% | 76 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | +0.31% | 61 | 25% |
By month resolved · 24 hours horizon
9 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“Bitcoin ($81k) closed above 50-week MA ($79k). Next target: 100-week MA ($89k) 🚀 Interactive chart: https://t.co/OrlNcbTbZf https://t.co/ok7HnDVcL7”
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @100trillionUSD head to head.
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 37.0% |
21 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | 0.16 | 70 | 25% |
All time · 24h
“Bitcoin closed August at $78,571 - Above 200 week MA $65k - Above 5 month (STH) realized price $72k - All realized prices are increasing again - Bitcoin in profit 72% (up from 50%) - Monthly RSI 51 (up from 41) IMO the bottom is behind us. I expect higher prices from here. https://t.co/h5IcFoBJG6”
“✅Bitcoin in profit > 70% (color overlay in this chat) ✅BTC > 200 week moving average (black line) ✅RSI > 50 (trend is up) ✅QE restarted Feels like the bear is dead and bulls are in charge🚀 https://t.co/kU0nUJXtdW”
“8) Different models (S2F/S2FX, power-law, lengthening cycles, diminishing returns) often converge on substantially higher long-term prices. They diverge on timing of peaks, cycle length, and how fast returns diminish. Time + data will sort them.”
“Bitcoin closed July $62,818 200-week moving average $63k Realized price $52k (still decreasing) Monthly RSI 43 (still < 50) It looks like bitcoin has started the bottoming process. This normally takes 1-3 months and BTC would drop lower during this phase (below realized). DYOR. https://t.co/2JlDHB4Jjq”
“@kryptosopus Indeed, and 20x from here would be the same as bitcoin growth of the last 10 years (from $3k to $60k), not unrealistic at all IMO.”
“Bitcoin just touched the 200-week MA again.📉 Nobody knows if this is THE bottom... But history shows: 🔵Blue zones are the BEST buying opportunities 🔵They ALWAYS touch the 200W MA 🔵They go up: ~$250 → ~$4k ~$4k → ~$20k ~$20k → ~$60k Interesting times ahead!👀 https://t.co/zTv21qEjIM”
“✅ below 200w moving average (black line) 🔳 below realized price (grey line $53k) ... https://t.co/U4QoTaNBNy”
“I disagree. Yes, timing bitcoin PRICE levels is very difficult and S2F is too crude a tool for that. However, I still think that bitcoin's VALUE should be higher than e.g. gold ($30T) one day because bitcoin is scarcer (higher S2F ratio) than gold. So for me the essence of S2F hypothesis (scarcity drives value) is still intact, and that is the main reason I hodl.”