Loading…
@rektcapital · Crypto Investor/Analyst Writes RC Newsletter: https://t.co/pFp14Jbs2r Follow for level-headed insights on Bitcoin and Altcoins
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
—
Low sample: 2 more calls to rank
Scored calls
13
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
0.0%
0 correct / 5 incorrect · 8 neutral
Avg 4h return / call
-0.44%
Avg return per call (4 hour horizon)
Following every call
-5.7%
Equal stake on all 13 calls resolved in the last 30 days
Mean alpha
-0.36%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (28) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 31% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 0.0% | 0 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −5.9% | 77 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | -0.36% | 15 | 25% |
By month resolved · 4 hours horizon
31 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“#BTC There's the invalidation, though no picture-perfect reclaim of~$78300 back into support took place Instead, price resembled more of a fake-breakdown below ~$78300 But because price did not bearish retest ~$78300, the bear case for additional downside was not validated Now, price is trying to position itself for a reclaim of ~$82200 into support $BTC #Bitcoin”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 100.0% |
73 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | -0.39 | 8 | 25% |
30 days · 4h