Loading profile…
@KillaXBT · Unclaimed · Rank #39 (Top 53%) · 90 days · 7 days horizon How it’s ranked
Quantitative trader, 7 years.
Coverage 5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Calls
78
5 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
47.4%
37 correct / 41 incorrect · 0 neutral
ROI
+0.3%
Average return per call: what following every call with an equal stake returned
Max drawdown
−0.9%
Worst peak-to-trough of following every call, as a share of the stake
Streak
0
Right calls in a row, newest first; neutral results are skipped
Coverage
190d
5 May 2026 – 10 Nov 2026
Best call
+23.8%“I have a small spot $SOL allocation. I’m not particularly bullish on it long term, but I think there’s a good chance we see something like this play out once $BTC starts trending higher again. Personally, I’m targeting a 75–100% move here, nothing too crazy. Patience. https://t.co/OCxR2COmtg https://t.co/uCmZZPe7fq”
Worst call
-24.5%“$BTC Structurally, we need to reclaim the 65K region. Right now, BTC is rejecting and compressing below it. If we fail to flip 65K, the probability of testing the weekly open at 62.8K increases. Lose the weekly open, and 61.8K–61.3K becomes likely. https://t.co/GH042a3B7U”
Every token @KillaXBT has called, most recent first. The badge is their latest call on it. 3 tokens, all time.
Last called 9 Nov 2026 · 245 calls since 5 May 2026
161 bullish · 84 bearish
Last called 2 Nov 2026 · 7 calls since 7 Jun 2026
5 bullish · 2 bearish
Last called 17 Oct 2026
By month resolved · 7 days horizon
324 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
| Posted (UTC) | Call | Asset | Direction | Price at post | Horizon | Price at horizon | Return | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:47 | “The bottom impulse candle never gets fully filled. A lot of people are always looking at the "imbalance", the "major weekly FVG", or the low volume transacted around that particular price region. Now, targeting imbalances can work, but during a bull market, the majority of imbalances formed by strong legs higher usually don't get fully filled. In fact, bottoming impulse candles historically tend to remain unfilled. And I think there's a relatively simple explanation for that. We chopped for 2 months, then pumped 27%, and the market is still sitting in disbelief. There isn't necessarily any incentive for the imbalance below to be fully filled. The imbalance formed in the first place because roughly 6B worth of shorts were liquidated, and that's only the visible liquidations we can actually see publicly. So, based on this context, the imbalance below doesn't need to be fully filled, and there's a good chance it won't be. The most we saw in 2022 was a partial fill, and even then, that wick was very quickly bought up. If we saw something similar this time around, it would equate to $BTC testing the low 70Ks. But again, that's not something I would guarantee either. The purpose of this post is simply to give you some insight into the characteristics of how bottoms are formed, and why these major imbalances can remain unfilled as price continues higher after months of chop. Technically speaking, I don't believe BTC will ever revisit my 62.6K 2x long entry again. I don't even expect it to revisit my 65.8K spot notional average that I shared publicly. In my view, the absolute worst case retest would be somewhere just shy of $0K, potentially the high 69Ks in the event of some form of capitulation. Outside of that, I don't expect anything significantly deeper. And even that could be a stretch. We could quite easily hold the 73K-75K region before eventually putting in another leg higher towards 85K. The main point is simple, an imbalance existing below price does not mean the market is obligated to fill it.” |
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @KillaXBT head to head.
90 days · 7d
| BTC |
| ▲ Bullish |
| $77,810 |
| 7d |
| $76,399 |
| -1.8% |
| incorrect |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:20 | “It seems like a select few are missing a few brain cells. I’m clearly not aiming for this scenario. It’s a joke directed at those still sidelined, desperately waiting for another sweep of the lows to enter, a sweep they may never get. I thought I had made myself abundantly clear by now, I believe the bottom is already in for bitcoin:native. The reason I continue to mock them is simple... they spent months mocking me for buying BTC at 65K & my swing long at 62.6K. Now that price has moved significantly higher, I’m simply returning the same energy. So it’s nice to finally give them a taste of their own medicine. ⚰️” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:34 | “If you simply observe significant sweeps of the highs/lows, you’ll realise just how profitable it is to take positions around these areas. When we sweep significant highs/lows, emotions peak. You start seeing people sway heavily in one direction, sentiment becomes one sided, and everyone suddenly raises targets or lowers targets. That is where the opportunity is. That is simply why I am patiently waiting for a significant sweep of the highs for my $BTC hedge short. HTF sweeps have always been some of the most effective areas for me to take solid RR trades with simple invalidation. You really don't need to overcomplicate it. Less is more. My biggest gains have always come from keeping things simple.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $78,755 | 7d | $75,689 | -3.9% | correct |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:32 | “Another interesting $BTC fractal. If we happened to establish a higher low around 77.6K, we would be inheriting somewhat similar characteristics to the PA we saw back in 2022. If something like this plays out, I would definitely be looking for hedge shorts above the current range highs. I’m still holding the 2x long and actively looking for a hedge short. But right now, there’s no reason to force anything. I’m staying patient and waiting for the right moment to present itself. Just thought it was worth sharing, as I trade a combination of patterns, recurring psychological dates, key events, and various other metrics to build confluence.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:18 | “Little pattern I have spotted. Back in 2022, after $BTC broke out of its range, price came back down to test the 0.5 level between the range high & range low before continuing higher. If we happen to follow a similar pattern, it would put a potential higher low around 70K. Of course, as I have already mentioned, I will be looking for continuation longs around 73-74K, with my invalidation remaining below the 57K low. Just thought I would showcase this fractal, as it is definitely something I wouldn't be surprised to see play out. And if it does happen, best believe a lot of people will turn bearish yet again right at the higher low.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:19 | “Why I believe the $BTC bottom is in. Its been a while... https://t.co/NySnffkNN9 https://t.co/GgbiQ19Lmu” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:58 | “The bottom always forms after 2 red 6 month candles. As stated, $BTC is HTF bullish & the bottom is in. https://t.co/dUuTyI0Hi4” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | $78,733 | 7d | $76,947 | -2.3% | incorrect |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:24 | “"Nearly every pump heading into Monday has ended up being retraced." By no surprise, $BTC saw a 2.5% pullback from the established highs on Monday. Standard ✅ https://t.co/JqOiR2Yfcf https://t.co/6uayHdKxEh” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $78,391 | 7d | $76,955 | -1.8% | correct |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:25 | “The math checks out. Each cycle, $BTC has been taking less time to create a new ATH. If we simply follow the 2022 cycle, a new ATH should be established no later than February 2028. But this cycle appears to be moving faster. We bottomed roughly 3-4 months earlier, which naturally brings the timeline forward. Based on the cycles shortening, I believe $BTC creates a new ATH in late Q4 next year. In other words, I expect us to be trading above 126K by November 2027.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:56 | “I’m not a particularly big fan of altcoins, or, in other words, shitcoins. I despise 99.9% of them and believe the vast majority deserve to eventually go to zero. But regardless of my personal opinion, when there’s money to be made, there’s money to be made. Historically, one of the best periods to gain exposure to alts is when $BTC begins to establish a bottom and slowly trends higher. Last cycle, we saw countless alts rally 300–500% while BTC moved from 16K to 74K. It was only once BTC began heavily outperforming and dominance pushed higher from 74K towards 126K that many alts started getting crushed. That’s why I believe there is money to be made in alts early in the cycle. If my thesis is correct and the BTC bottom is already in, then many altcoins have likely established significant lows as well. I mentioned my SOL buy at $76 numerous times. I’m still holding that position, and it’s now up roughly 50% from entry. Yesterday, I shared my ASTER swing long, where I’m targeting a 50–100% move at minimum. I also previously shared my HYPE spot/long entry at $51.55, which went on to rally roughly 70%. The point is simple, if you position early, before the real bull expansion begins, there is serious money to be made. We’ll likely start seeing random alts pop one by one, which is exactly why I’ve started taking selective exposure again. For now, I’m sticking with the positions I’ve already mentioned, including my recent $ASTER entry, while looking for a few more coins to load.” | $ASTER | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:56 | “I’m not a particularly big fan of altcoins, or, in other words, shitcoins. I despise 99.9% of them and believe the vast majority deserve to eventually go to zero. But regardless of my personal opinion, when there’s money to be made, there’s money to be made. Historically, one of the best periods to gain exposure to alts is when $BTC begins to establish a bottom and slowly trends higher. Last cycle, we saw countless alts rally 300–500% while BTC moved from 16K to 74K. It was only once BTC began heavily outperforming and dominance pushed higher from 74K towards 126K that many alts started getting crushed. That’s why I believe there is money to be made in alts early in the cycle. If my thesis is correct and the BTC bottom is already in, then many altcoins have likely established significant lows as well. I mentioned my SOL buy at $76 numerous times. I’m still holding that position, and it’s now up roughly 50% from entry. Yesterday, I shared my ASTER swing long, where I’m targeting a 50–100% move at minimum. I also previously shared my HYPE spot/long entry at $51.55, which went on to rally roughly 70%. The point is simple, if you position early, before the real bull expansion begins, there is serious money to be made. We’ll likely start seeing random alts pop one by one, which is exactly why I’ve started taking selective exposure again. For now, I’m sticking with the positions I’ve already mentioned, including my recent $ASTER entry, while looking for a few more coins to load.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:50 | “In 1 year from now, $BTC will be at new ATHs. And I can assure you of one thing, Absolutely nobody will give a shit whether you bought at 79K, 90K, or even 100K. Because when you zoom out, the difference becomes irrelevant. Price. Go. Up. https://t.co/GmdgHKnYi9” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:52 | “I am swing long on $ASTER. I see $1.20 as the minimum target, with potential extensions toward $1.40. We’re coming out of nearly 200 days of range compression, so I expect this move to take time to fully develop. Invalidation remains below the range lows. For now, I’m simply letting the position play out.” | $ASTER | ▲ Bullish | $0.7753 | 7d | $0.6976 | -10.0% | incorrect |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:58 | “$BTC Currently, we have a nice cluster of longs sitting below the current 76K low. After sweeping the 82K highs, if we continue to hold below the established range high, then the liquidity below becomes the next logical target given we’re still trading within a range. It might take some time to materialize though. That’s usually how these ranges develop. Before we see significant long delta taken, price will front-run the lows a few times, allowing more liquidity to build before the eventual sweep.” | BTC | ▼ Bearish | $79,706 | 7d | $77,105 | -3.3% | correct |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:13 | “After every major impulse/correction, $BTC tends to chop. It’s a simple dynamic when you detach emotion & trade the structure. We’ve already had a strong impulse higher, so naturally I expect some range/chop to follow. With the trend now bullish, I’ll favor longs on retests. That doesn’t mean you can’t short the range highs, just understand you’re trading counter-trend, so size accordingly.” | BTC | ▲ Bullish | — | 7d | — | — | unscored |
