Loading…
@CryptoMichNL · CIO & Founder @MNFund_ and @MNCapital_vc | Host of @new_era_finance | Macro-Economics, Value Based Investing & Trading | Crypto & Bitcoin Enthusiast
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
—
Low sample: 14 more calls to rank
Scored calls
1
2 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
—
0 correct / 0 incorrect · 1 neutral
Avg 7d return / call
+0.97%
Avg return per call (7 day horizon)
Following every call
+1.0%
Equal stake on all 1 calls resolved in the last 24 hours
Mean alpha
+0.97%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (50) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 0% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | — | 58 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −0.0% | 58 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | +0.97% | 50 | 25% |
By month resolved · 7 days horizon
Not enough history in this window for a trend.
24 hours · 7d
1 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“I've mentioned this before: The $84,000 level is a crucial one to break for #Bitcoin. It didn't. We continue to consolidate. That's why I think that $82,000 is a level which must-hold. The reason for that is that I think that once it loses that level, we'll start to grab liquidity way lower and we'll accelerate deeper. What's on the cards then? Potentially $79K, or even $77K would be possible. A longer period of consolidation then.”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 100.0% |
33 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | 0.18 | 50 | 25% |