Loading…
@CredibleCrypto · *Tweets are my opinion, not financial advice* All OFFICIAL platform links and content are ONLY found on my website below.
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
53
Top 47% · #9 of 18 ranked
Scored calls
114
8 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
55.3%
26 correct / 21 incorrect · 67 neutral
Avg 7d return / call
-0.35%
Avg return per call (7 day horizon)
Following every call
-39.9%
Equal stake on all 114 calls resolved in the last 90 days
Mean alpha
-0.30%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (61) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 6% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 55.1% | 91 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −73.4% | 44 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | -0.30% | 31 | 25% |
By month resolved · 7 days horizon
21 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“I've talked about why I ignored your 1st subwave off the lows in prior vids and the rationale behind the 1-2 preference, but check this recent video regarding the current accumulation structure that argues for why our low may already be in before the next impulse: https://t.co/3MbWrD5o6n”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 100.0% |
88 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | -0.03 | 59 | 25% |
90 days · 7d
“Here we go, now send it straight to $3. ethereum:0x4e3fbd56cd56c3e72c1403e103b45db9da5b9d2b https://t.co/t9lwotnlW2 https://t.co/HzKrfcAwxE”
“Yea so that 300k upper limit was based on some ROI calcs relative to the larger macro cycle, but have been thinking about it and starting to think its possible we could technically even breach that. Don't necessarily think its likely atm, I think more realistically we end up somewhere in the 200k's.”
“Just barely missed our local highs on that last push up on $BTC before getting slammed back into our range. Still have the same expectations for both $BTC and $ETH for now. That is, looking for liquidity to be taken to the upside before a "larger" correction back down. This again is in context of the broader, higher TF outlook which is continuation of the larger uptrend to new all time highs after the "shakeout" that is being described here.”
“@GVOCollective @saitama_98 Yes. Well if ETH hits 20k like I’m expecting an equivalent marketcap on XRP puts in in the $20+ range already.”
“$TRAC is beginning to lift up off of it's HTF accumulation zone once again, after another couple of months of accumulation. Each prior rally off of this zone has failed, but eventually one won't and at that point it will be too late to accumulate at deeply discounted prices. We can take a look at the TRAC/BTC pairing for a clue as to when we may be getting ready for some serious expansion. TRAC/BTC is basically currently deviating below a clean HTF range, with 2 attempts at a reclaim already. We now look to be getting ready for a 3rd attempt to reclaim our HTF/macro range lows. Once we successfully reclaim this level we have a 200+% rise to the range highs, which should easily send $TRAC past the built up series of lower highs and into the $1.50+ region for a cool 5x to start. Personally, I'd prefer if we fail this reclaim again because I don't quite feel like I've accumulate as much spot as I'd like just yet- but I have a feeling TRAC won't wait for me to accumulate much longer. If you haven't done your due diligence on $TRAC yet, do it now, because if you keep putting it off it may be too late to establish a good position soon...”
“Meanwhile $BTC has swept higher TF lows but also left behind equal lows on LTF. Think we may take those if/when we take the triple lows on $ETH. Lots of liquidity still remaining on $BTC to the upside as well and that's the more significant draw atm imo. Like ETH would prefer to take the equal lows now as opposed to going for the highs first and leaving them behind (potentially for later).”
“We have left behind our equal lows on $ETH for now, and we now have triple untapped lows. Again, would prefer to take them before a move back up to the highs because if we don't and we move up in a corrective manner again the assumption is that we may come back down again for them later. Let's see how things develop- for now the chop continues within our range.”
“We got an initial, decent reaction off of our local demand zone on $ETH but it failed to produce a higher high and the subsequent move back down broke our local demand zone. On the bright side, if we take our "equal lows" now (which seems likely), it means the next time we pump to the upside it may be more sustainable as liq to the downside will have already been taken. Essentially rather than taking the highs and potentially pushing to 2800+ before our "larger dip" we may just be getting the "larger dip" out of the way now. Let's see if we can officially take those equal (well now triple) lows and then watch to see how PA develops from there.”
“We are currently getting the scenario on bitcoin:native described in the short vid I put out yesterday- that is that we had an initial rejection off of our highs and have now pulled back into the local range that we broke out from (I've changed this local range to BLUE for clarity). I would like to see a local base here formed over the coming days for an attempt at the 82.8k highs. Ideally something like below would give us a nice long opp back to the highs.”
“We now have an argument for a completed 5 wave move up off of our .29 lows on ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52. If this is correct, then we likely have a bit of a correction incoming. As previously mentioned, the .33 level (BLUE line) is the most historically significant level on the entire chart and has not yet been backtested on lower timeframes after our monthly reclaim of it, so this is the most logical level to keep an eye on for a reaction in the event that we have begun correcting the move up off of .29.”
“"That said the technical target (local highs of the triple tap base) has now been met, so the real test here is if the established LTF base will now act as support on a retest and give us a higher low before heading for the larger range highs at .35, or if we will now continue lower to the range lows at .28-.29." Looks like it's the latter. Remember, any chop above .20 is noise and ultimately consolidation following our first impulsive move off the .20 lows. Eyes on our range lows of .28-.29 for now. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”
“$ETH to 20k. https://t.co/b2d98LSjgj”
“@buzzearthling @AndrewBianco1 When BTC dominance is below 35% thats likely the beginning of the end.”
“Based on the time and depth of the current pullback I have to assume that we are already in our Wave 2, correcting what I now assume to be a completed 5 wave impulse off the .20 lows. We are still technically holding the flipped supply zone which is our first area of interest on the downside. Remember, corrective moves like this can take a variety of shapes/forms, so if we DO start moving back up to the highs we should try and identify whether that move occurs impulsively (next impulse has begun) or correctively (move up is just part of the corrective Wave 2 and a potential fake out). For those looking to hop on the train, any dips into the consolidation zone that preceded our impulsive move (zone in BLUE) would be the ideal entry, with a clear invalidation level at the .20 lows. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”