@CredibleCrypto · *Tweets are my opinion, not financial advice* All OFFICIAL platform links and content are ONLY found on my website below.
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
35
Top 65% · #7 of 10 ranked
Scored calls
38
8 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
50.0%
19 correct / 19 incorrect · 0 neutral
Avg 7d return / call
-1.39%
Avg return per call (7 day horizon)
Following every call
-52.7%
Equal stake on all 38 calls resolved in the last 30 days
Mean alpha
-1.59%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (37) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 3% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 46.2% | 79 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −70.0% | 21 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | -1.59% | 10 | 25% |
By month resolved · 7 days horizon
80 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“We have left behind our equal lows on $ETH for now, and we now have triple untapped lows. Again, would prefer to take them before a move back up to the highs because if we don't and we move up in a corrective manner again the assumption is that we may come back down again for them later. Let's see how things develop- for now the chop continues within our range.”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 80.0% |
72 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | -0.20 | 17 | 25% |
30 days · 7d
“$CVX has hit our "bottom zone". https://t.co/qpbQ96lbf1 https://t.co/asnecT4x4W”
“Don't miss the forest for the trees. Bottom on $BTC is somewhere between where we are now and about 10% lower before a 200+% rally to the upside. If you want more context and/or want to hear the logic and rationale behind this statement I explained it all in depth in my last Youtube video which you can watch here: https://t.co/CaBepyzVwx”
“We got an initial, decent reaction off of our local demand zone on $ETH but it failed to produce a higher high and the subsequent move back down broke our local demand zone. On the bright side, if we take our "equal lows" now (which seems likely), it means the next time we pump to the upside it may be more sustainable as liq to the downside will have already been taken. Essentially rather than taking the highs and potentially pushing to 2800+ before our "larger dip" we may just be getting the "larger dip" out of the way now. Let's see if we can officially take those equal (well now triple) lows and then watch to see how PA develops from there.”
“An update on $CVX since so many keep asking- we took the lows that I wanted to see taken but it's still possible we will see a wick into the green demand zone below before our bottom is found- all explained about 5 days ago as well. https://t.co/x0Apo9NThV https://t.co/IdyXSmNoVH”