Loading…
@CredibleCrypto · *Tweets are my opinion, not financial advice* All OFFICIAL platform links and content are ONLY found on my website below.
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
—
Low sample: 3 more calls to rank
Scored calls
12
8 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
75.0%
3 correct / 1 incorrect · 8 neutral
Avg 30d return / call
-0.21%
Avg return per call (30 day horizon)
Following every call
-2.6%
Equal stake on all 12 calls resolved in the last 7 days
Mean alpha
-1.51%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (94) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 0% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 70.6% | 100 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −13.3% | 100 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | -1.51% | 96 | 25% |
By month resolved · 30 days horizon
Not enough history in this window for a trend.
7 days · 30d
33 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“@Nieu_X I covered this in my last Youtube vid I believe- assuming we have just finished our 1st subwave of the extended 5th and have a 3rd and 5th subwave to go- could certainly play out over a year or two.”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 71.4% |
84 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | -0.07 | 88 | 25% |
“.32 lows taken .29 lows held send it to the range highs posthaste ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/sW5et03lKE”
“.32 lows taken .29 lows held send it to the range highs posthaste ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/sW5et03lKE”
“And there is our sweep of the .32 lows right into our previously front-run local demand (blue) zone. Now that that's out of the way, can we finally send it 😤 ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/LS6o3aBFTU https://t.co/XTm9EUXxSP”
“They told you this was FUD when I first posted it. Triple lows cleaned up. A healthy correction, nothing more. ethereum:native https://t.co/G2SS1IhjhW https://t.co/1sPT41pbrT”
“Ah well it seems I am in the presence of a legend here haha. Always wondered what it would have been like to live through those times. I think the problem with "cycles" is that everyone defines them differently. For example- my argument has always been that we are still in the first secular bull cycle on crypto (within which there have been a few cycles of a smaller degree). If you think about crypto relative to the SPX for example, it can be argued that our last major crash was the housing crisis in 2008, since then, and for nearly 18 years now, we've been in a broader bull market on equities or as I would call it a single larger secular bull cycle. Trad markets have been ramping up and will soon be going parabolic, which would make the end of that secular bull run. Crypto has only ever existed in this environment though, and in the same way that trad equities have essentially been in a raging bull since 2008, it is my belief that crypto has been in a larger bull since inception as well. In other words- the .com bust is yet to come imo (but not before that final parabolic phase on crypto that will imo, probably take us to 10T+ before a major collapse). In any case, only time will tell, but this has been my stance since Bitcoin was trading at 3k in 2018, and we are finally reaching the final quarter of that secular bull imo.”
“First it was $BTC, then it was $ETH, then it was $XRP, then it was $ZEC, So dust off those bags and see who's left, the old guard's back, so who's up next? $LTC, the silver to the gold, $XLM and $ADA, the stories of old, $DOGE off the leash, $LINK off the chain, $XMR creeping up quietly again. They called them dinosaurs, they left them for dead, "Go chase the shiny new thing instead!" But after the years of sideways and pain, the OGs are beginning to run the show again. So laugh at the fossils, go on, have your fun, the old guard's not finished, they've only just begun...”
“We are retesting our historically significant .328 level on LTF here after a LTF reclaim. Ideally we can get another push up to take the resting liq into .36 before a potential pullback (into another higher low). ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/OoNjbvltEJ https://t.co/d1Sh46bBNO”
“We are retesting our historically significant .328 level on LTF here after a LTF reclaim. Ideally we can get another push up to take the resting liq into .36 before a potential pullback (into another higher low). ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/OoNjbvltEJ https://t.co/d1Sh46bBNO”
“@Shaks2t Nope not at all. Before a massive rally it’s typical to get these longer sideways corrections (see BTC at 24-25k).”
“Meanwhile $BTC has swept higher TF lows but also left behind equal lows on LTF. Think we may take those if/when we take the triple lows on $ETH. Lots of liquidity still remaining on $BTC to the upside as well and that's the more significant draw atm imo. Like ETH would prefer to take the equal lows now as opposed to going for the highs first and leaving them behind (potentially for later).”
“We have left behind our equal lows on $ETH for now, and we now have triple untapped lows. Again, would prefer to take them before a move back up to the highs because if we don't and we move up in a corrective manner again the assumption is that we may come back down again for them later. Let's see how things develop- for now the chop continues within our range.”
“$CVX has hit our "bottom zone". https://t.co/qpbQ96lbf1 https://t.co/asnecT4x4W”
“Don't miss the forest for the trees. Bottom on $BTC is somewhere between where we are now and about 10% lower before a 200+% rally to the upside. If you want more context and/or want to hear the logic and rationale behind this statement I explained it all in depth in my last Youtube video which you can watch here: https://t.co/CaBepyzVwx”
“We got an initial, decent reaction off of our local demand zone on $ETH but it failed to produce a higher high and the subsequent move back down broke our local demand zone. On the bright side, if we take our "equal lows" now (which seems likely), it means the next time we pump to the upside it may be more sustainable as liq to the downside will have already been taken. Essentially rather than taking the highs and potentially pushing to 2800+ before our "larger dip" we may just be getting the "larger dip" out of the way now. Let's see if we can officially take those equal (well now triple) lows and then watch to see how PA develops from there.”