Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 2 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC

Nebraskangooner

@Nebraskangooner

Quoting · 30 Sept 2026, 01:59 UTC · context given to the AI

$VVV I mapped these zones a few weeks back. Sometimes it's cool to look back and see how price action respects levels. Clean. https://t.co/NcwQQRX0zh https://t.co/N3L6VTFLSC

Cool to see $VVV levels continue to control price action! Unfortunately this looks like a head and shoulders neckline breaking down... Measured downside target would be around $12. https://t.co/hSNkfd5hei https://t.co/YGlXWol3cK

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first $VVV price at or after publication, $21.40 at 2 Nov 2026, 22:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $22.84 at 3 Nov 2026, 22:00 UTC.
r = 22.839913814345 / 21.4001905433575 − 1 = +6.7%
Direction d = −1 (bearish), so d × r = -6.7% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Memecoins: $VVV ($VVV)
Direction: ▼ Bearish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “Cool to see $VVV levels continue to control price action!”
Confidence: 99%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Outcome record

Status

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction