Loading…
Published 1 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC · fetched 1 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC
CrediBULL Crypto
@CredibleCrypto
Quoting · 1 Nov 2026, 04:18 UTC · context given to the AI
SOL has been underperforming against BTC since the highs at 126k (even before that). It should not be a controversial statement to say that if BTC climbs to 90k+ and then sees a 20-30% correction from those levels, that alts like SOL would get hit harder and potentially see a 50%+ correction, and/or a lower low while BTC prints a higher low in the low 70k's. SOL was trading at $59 when $BTC put its bottom in at 59k not too long ago. I really don't think me claiming that SOL could drop a few $'s below that (to the $50 target) in the event of another larger correction on BTC is that radical.In reply to · 1 Nov 2026, 10:54 UTC · context given to the AI
@CredibleCrypto @e_nomics_ How can sol do that by itself, hahahaha it depends on BTC. Btc would have to touch 40s for that. This app is crazy.@citurna @e_nomics_ SOL has been underperforming BTC since 126k and was trading at $59 the last time BTC was at 59k. So no, it would not take a 40k BTC to see SOL at $50, it would just take further continued weakness on SOL relative to BTC during the next large BTC pullback. https://t.co/xqIgaxL6upView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction