Published 1 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC · fetched 1 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC
CrediBULL Crypto
@CredibleCrypto
Quoting · 1 Nov 2026, 04:18 UTC · context given to the AI
SOL has been underperforming against BTC since the highs at 126k (even before that). It should not be a controversial statement to say that if BTC climbs to 90k+ and then sees a 20-30% correction from those levels, that alts like SOL would get hit harder and potentially see a 50%+ correction, and/or a lower low while BTC prints a higher low in the low 70k's. SOL was trading at $59 when $BTC put its bottom in at 59k not too long ago. I really don't think me claiming that SOL could drop a few $'s below that (to the $50 target) in the event of another larger correction on BTC is that radical.In reply to · 1 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC · context given to the AI
@CredibleCrypto @e_nomics_ BTC holds the lows but SOL makes new lows? One of the strongest L1s with solid weekly structure and relative strength only dumps hard when BTC itself breaks lower. FA short term is irrelevant I agree but a top alt crashing while BTC holds is pretty rare historically. (No hate)You can read the back and forth here, what I’m saying really should not be controversial if BTC rallies to 90k+ and then sees a deeper pullback. If we don’t get a deeper pullback then of course would not be expecting a deeper dive on SOL as well. But my primary bias right now is that a rally to 90k+ isn’t the slam dunk many think it will be and we have to be cautious on a move to those levels.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction