Published 1 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC · fetched 1 Nov 2026, 13:21 UTC
Michaël van de Poppe
@CryptoMichNL
Quoting · 31 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC · context given to the AI
It's very likely that we'll see new highs for $NEAR in Q4. I've been bearish on $NEAR in the short-term, after it's massive run towards $5+ that it has seen. Now that we've very likely concluded the correction, it's very likely that we'll start to see more momentum coming in. The reason for this is very simple: ➡️ Losing the range took place during the Binance hack and accelerated into price action all the way towards the next level ($3.90, which we've marked earlier). ➡️ You're looking at response at that price level. This was strong, a ton of volume came in. ➡️ After that, $4.20 flipped as support and now it's trying to flip back into the range that it was acting in prior. There are no 100% arguments of the reversal, just yet, but it's on the horizon. We're looking at a clear breakout above $4.60 and then we're of towards new highs. If there's a dip taking place (which could happen, but no to new lows, as this weekly is incredibly strong), I would be betting it. A flip of $4.60 I'd also be interested.#Bitcoin is in for tests at $80,000. It has taken the low on Friday, in which liquidity was taken beneath that low during the correction of the Binance hack. All right, that has happened, what's next? Well, if the long side has been taken, at some point we'll find ourselves into a situation of the short side to be taken. Most obvious levels for those; - $78,800 - $79,800 If the latter breaks, I think that price will start to accelerate quite fastly, however, probably we'll need a few more days of consolidation for that in order to be making it happen. Other than that, I don't think we'll start to see a deep correction towards the lows again. If it happens, I'm max bidding <$75,000.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction