Published 22 Oct 2026, 15:34 UTC · fetched 26 Oct 2026, 06:05 UTC
CrediBULL Crypto
@CredibleCrypto
In reply to · 22 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC · context given to the AI
@CredibleCrypto while we’re ranging a bit, curious on your take on the CRV/CVX flywheel this go round. From what I understand, the old loop was basically: Curve volume/fees created demand for CRV (locking + boosting), Convex made locking easier and juiced the yields + gauge power, which locked more CRV and pointed emissions where they wanted. Self-reinforcing more than straight competition. DeFi’s been pretty quiet this cycle outside of the stablecoin stuff and the tokenization narrative. Once we get a proper macro push and retail starts chasing yields again, do you see that same CRV/CVX feedback loop kicking back in? Or has enough changed (more ve models, different emission games, etc.) that it plays out differently? Mostly wondering if you think it shows up more as a later-cycle rotation (like during a longer W4 once things are already hot), or if it can start earlier. Appreciate any thoughts when you got time sir.Well keep in mind a higher price in and of itself kicks off the flywheel. Remember, $CVX has claim to half of the emissions of CRV, regardless of fees/volume generated by Curve. So if CRV price goes up, then value of emissions goes up, which means yield for locking CVX goes up, which means demand for CVX rises, higher demand raises CVX price, and then at some point a pricey CVX should drag CRV even higher and the cycle repeats.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction