Published 18 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC
Poseidon
@CryptoPoseidonn
In reply to · 17 Oct 2026, 21:32 UTC · context given to the AI
The upcoming weekly close on $BTC is relatively irrelevant for me. Here is what I am actually focused on, on higher TF's: Again, on LTF I am looking for a move up to take all the untapped liquidity above us (as per my chart here: https://t.co/XbuBN9K62O) however even if this LTF move plays out it does not change the fact that we are still pushing up against a massive, HTF supply zone and without impulsive PA there is a high likelihood of rejection once again as we form what is essentially a HTF consolidation range (orange) before the next impulsive leg to the upside. Meanwhile we have a massive liquidity void beneath us, and with the origin of our HTF impulse in the low 60k's, dipping into this liquidity void would not break significant HTF market structure and/or affect the HTF bull thesis in the slightest- it would again just be a deviation below our potential consolidation range in orange before the next impulsive leg up actually begins. As always, we actively monitor LTF PA for potential changes to the expected path, but for now and based on everything I am seeing at this time, this is the most logical/likely HTF scenario imo.@CredibleCrypto Same thoughtsView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction