Published 13 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Killa
@KillaXBT
Quoting · 4 Jun 2026, 17:48 UTC · context given to the AI
I am officially swing long on $BTC Invalidation 31950. Target 160,000. I will see you in 1-2 years from now. Let the games begin. 🎲 https://t.co/JOuDq69gOk https://t.co/5zwRVTAFnCWell, it’s been a while since I’ve updated this position. This was one of my boldest positions. Longing the $BTC bottom publicly. There’s not much to update apart from the fact that we’re going a lot higher on the HTF. We’ve formed a weekly HH, flipped the 100 and 200 EMAs on the weekly and are forming a crossover. We’ve also flipped almost every single moving average metric, confirming that the bottom is in. The only difference is seasonality. The only thing making people question this is the fact that we didn’t bottom in Q4. Did you really have to be that naive to think we’d follow the exact same pattern every single cycle forever? That’s just not logical. Markets evolve. BTC is evolving. As for my target, it’s still the same. In fact, we could go higher. But I won’t be closing anything from this particular long position until we’re trading above $0.15M per coin. We’re still 60% away from the ATH. There’s still money to be made, even if you didn’t get the best entry. Till then, the trend is your friend. You shouldn't be taking any shorts below ATH.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction