Loading…
Published 11 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC
CrypNuevo 🔨
@CrypNuevo
In reply to · 11 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC · context given to the AI
In Ethereum, in my opinion, it's very clear that it needs some more downside because the two main liquidity areas are to the downside. There must be a lot of liquidity right below those local lows. I think it's probably too much liquidity for MMs to ignore - so they'll take it. https://t.co/W3pM90PCz4If the first move for Bitcoin is to the downside to fill that wick, I'll step in longs after reclaiming $82.5k with a target above $87.5k. This would align with ETH sweeping the local lows. I would be more aggresive and go long as soon as we recovered the previous local lows. https://t.co/ZbInxP7SZNView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction