Loading…
Published 9 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC
swarmik
@swarmister
Quoting · 8 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC · context given to the AI
It's either that or he goes without food https://t.co/QyiGZiMOzkIn reply to · 9 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC · context given to the AI
I’m seeing a bullish structure break on lower timeframes for $BTC. With that in mind, I opened a long on $NEAR and added a bit more to my alt positions. This is exactly what I was talking about earlier today. The scenario looks good overall, and it would be nice to get a strong weekly candle close. Reminder: I’ve been long since $80,700, as I mentioned here yesterday. But now I’m significantly more confident in further upside.I’m talking about the long I opened yesterday before going to sleep. Structurally, I honestly expected a retest after the move into 82,900, but price turned out to be stronger than I anticipated. Overall, that’s a very good sign, especially given my main idea of getting a strong weekly candle close. Hopefully, tomorrow (10.10) won’t bring another bloodbath like last year. I lost a lot of money that day, and the PTSD from that experience still affects how I trade. I’m keeping my positions smaller and being more cautious now.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 81863.56 / 82952.53 − 1 = -1.3%d × r = -1.3% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrectOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction