Published 6 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC
Sminston With 👁
@sminston_with
Quoting · 6 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTC · context given to the AI
Gromen: what if I told you, it's not about the peaks (bubbles) at all Because you know what hasn't been diminishing exponentially? The floor rate Even without the bubbles at all, $1M is projected to come around in ~Apr 2035 https://t.co/8LM7ZoV16d https://t.co/4qxaSflLlN https://t.co/EtHifBgYQIIn reply to · 6 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTC · context given to the AI
This pretty much sums up the discrepancies people see in BTC returns over the past years. They want non correlated asset that behaves like a savings technology or digital gold, But they still want 80 vol with 80 cagr. Obviously as a market grows it takes more marginal new dollars to effect the same amount of volatility to as BTC grows in market share, volatility should go down. Which is exactly what is happening. There is no other way to explain this behavior other than power law growth. Derivatives are simply the extension of a growing market. So long as derivs end up settled in the underlying, then long term adoption continues.@hillery_dan What surprised me was his surprise/concern at the diminishing bubbles, this has been tracked for a long time - but the undercurrent drives on https://t.co/HGkloo1PkBView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction