Published 24 Sept 2026, 10:49 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Killa
@KillaXBT
Quoting · 23 Sept 2026, 18:36 UTC · context given to the AI
Last bear market, $BTC dropped 78%. This bear market dropped 54%. Significantly less aggressive. Last cycle, once the bull market began, the largest retracements before Bitcoin reached its ATH were 20-22%. BTC never pulled back more than 22% on its entire run to ATH. If we apply the same proportional logic to this cycle, a less severe bear market should also lead to less severe bull market pullbacks. That puts the larger retracements this cycle in roughly the 10-15% region. Mathematically, that means buying retracements with 4x leverage should be relatively safe throughout the move toward 126K, provided you are not blindly longing the top of every candle (even if you did, you still wouldn't get liquidated on 4x). If you are entering on actual pullbacks rather than chasing, you can be more aggressive with leverage where the setup allows it. My point is simple... this cycle’s retracements are likely to be shallower than past cycles. Be prepared for that.This is a very important post & I suggest you read it at least 10 times. I believe the bottom is in. From here to $126K, I expect the largest pullbacks in this bull market to be roughly 10–15%. That means, theoretically, if $87K acts as our local high before a deeper retrace to the low-$70Ks, this would be the area where Bitcoin would find its floor. If we were to reach those levels, I’d be looking to significantly increase my continuation longs. As I’ve said numerous times, I rarely short during bull markets unless price is testing a strong, well defined area. Right now, Bitcoin is testing a critical zone around the $80Ks. If we can hold the previous range high we flipped, there’s still a very real possibility of continuation to the upside. So while a pullback could happen, downside is limited. The only place which I would feel comfortable taking shorts around would be in the $90Ks.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction