Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 21 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC

Alejandro₿TC

@Alejandro_XBT

Call me crazy, but I don’t believe this move. Back in 2018, Bitcoin had several 80% rallies too, and every single time people were calling the bottom… right before BTC eventually collapsed to $3K. My view hasn’t changed. I still don’t think the bear market is over, and if I’m right, this move should be close to running out of steam.

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $85,300 at 21 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $86,016 at 22 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC.
r = 86016.24 / 85300 − 1 = +0.8%
Direction d = −1 (bearish), so d × r = -0.8% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction: ▼ Bearish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “Back in 2018, Bitcoin had several 80% rallies too, and every single time people were calling the bottom… right before BTC eventually collapsed to $3K.”
Confidence: 100%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction