Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 19 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC

Wolf 🐺

@IamCryptoWolf

Quoting · 29 Jun 2026, 17:25 UTC · context given to the AI

ETH vs RUSSELL RSI bottom. https://t.co/BDW0km9424

This might be the $ETH chart people regret ignoring. $ETH vs Russell 2000. Called the bottom. The catch-up followed. Now we’re entering the part of the structure where expansion can happen fast. Next destination: back to ATHs. https://t.co/mIUBlQD1Ay https://t.co/A70UCMRd4E

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first ETH price at or after publication, $2,640 at 19 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $2,579 at 20 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC.
r = 2578.84 / 2640.18 − 1 = -2.3%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -2.3% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Ethereum (ETH)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “This might be the $ETH chart people regret ignoring.”
Confidence: 100%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Outcome record

Status

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction