Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 18 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC

John

@CryptoGodJohn

In reply to · 18 Sept 2026, 19:23 UTC · context given to the AI

The crazy thing about $PAID is that it actually can make big known normies to engage Normies that don't care about crypto and never heard / cared about our space https://t.co/RikvuObsgW

@Overdose_AI If $MEME went from $30m to $150m in one candle after Vlad engaged with the CEO of AMC I think $PAID can go to $500m in one candle X Money is Elon’s baby. He has been paid $100k+ in 48 hours. This is free marketing and publicity for X Money and he’s getting paid 6 figs for it

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first $PAID price at or after publication, $0.0331 at 18 Sept 2026, 20:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $0.02239 at 19 Sept 2026, 20:00 UTC.
r = 0.022391305316965093 / 0.03310078189894933 − 1 = -32.4%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -32.4% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Memecoins: $PAID ($PAID)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “@Overdose_AI If $MEME went from $30m to $150m in one candle after Vlad engaged with the CEO of AMC I think $PAID can go to $500m in one candle”
Confidence: 93%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction