Loading…

Prediction evidence

correctPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 18 Sept 2026, 03:10 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC

SalsaTekila

@SalsaTekila

In reply to · 18 Sept 2026, 03:08 UTC · context given to the AI

brother we had all the time in the world to purchase sub 6k BTC the market structure preceding matters so much to bottom formations... https://t.co/Bjzw5Q0h0X

@juhrafftrades We had record bearish sentiment, repeated FUD that failed to push us down, a large short OI buildup in record low volatility environment. This time around the sentiment is different, and so is positioning. I think we go up, but high lev will get fucked

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $77,312 at 18 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $81,105 at 19 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC.
r = 81105.04 / 77312.13 − 1 = +4.9%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = +4.9% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correct

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “@juhrafftrades We had record bearish sentiment, repeated FUD that failed to push us down, a large short OI buildup in record low volatility environment. This time around the sentiment is different, and so is positioning. I think we go up, but high lev will get fucked”
Confidence: 98%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction