Published 17 Sept 2026, 14:13 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC
Killa
@KillaXBT
Quoting · 30 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC · context given to the AI
bitcoin:native Upper 80s > Lower 70s. Lower 70s > Upper 90s. Upper 90s > Lower 80s. Lower 80s > 120s. Hate the message, not the messenger. https://t.co/QF9YtbiS2HThe plan for $BTC hasn’t changed. I still believe BTC will form a higher low before making its next leg towards 90K. However, that move may not begin directly from the current wick. Typically, after the market makes a strong move upwards, it consolidates, establishes a range and builds liquidity. Then, once it is genuinely ready for continuation, price capitulates significantly below the range lows before reversing higher. We saw a similar structure in 2023: BTC rallied from 16K to 24K, retraced towards 19K, and then continued towards 30K. That final capitulation marked the higher low before the next major leg. This is why I believe it may still be too early for BTC to move directly towards 90K. The current low could hold, but it may not be the final low of this range. We could continue ranging for longer before seeing the true capitulation wick, potentially into the low 70Ks, that marks the bottom before continuation. Another common strategy is to deviate above the range highs first, lure traders into longs and build confidence, before aggressively reversing towards the lows. We saw that exact sequence in 2023. Could it happen again? We will have to wait and see. It is a textbook liquidity cycle: build the range, lure traders into positions, make them comfortable, liquidate them, and then begin the real move higher. My current view is that BTC may not yet be ready for the push towards 90K. That increases the likelihood of the range holding for longer, with the true capitulation wick occurring only when the market is genuinely ready for expansion.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction