Loading…

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 6 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:58 UTC

Merlijn The Trader

@MerlijnTrader

In reply to · 5 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC · context given to the AI

@MerlijnTrader Bitcoin has a funny way of turning the price everyone was afraid to buy into the price everyone later wishes they had.

@WallStreetXHQ 100% true and the most painfull way is going up because most ppl say we have to go down

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $79,954 at 6 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $79,917 at 7 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC.
r = 79917.01 / 79954.32 − 1 = -0.0%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -0.0% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: inferred
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “@WallStreetXHQ 100% true and the most painfull way is going up because most ppl say we have to go down”
Confidence: 89%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3