Loading…
Published 28 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC · fetched 19 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC
CrediBULL Crypto
@CredibleCrypto
Quoting · 27 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC · context given to the AI
Did indeed mark a local bottom. That said the technical target (local highs of the triple tap base) has now been met, so the real test here is if the established LTF base will now act as support on a retest and give us a higher low before heading for the larger range highs at .35, or if we will now continue lower to the range lows at .28-.29. Move up off our triple tap lows was not impulsive, so don't have high confidence in either direction here atm- still technically chopping within the broader range (.28-.35). Let's see how things develop."That said the technical target (local highs of the triple tap base) has now been met, so the real test here is if the established LTF base will now act as support on a retest and give us a higher low before heading for the larger range highs at .35, or if we will now continue lower to the range lows at .28-.29." Looks like it's the latter. Remember, any chop above .20 is noise and ultimately consolidation following our first impulsive move off the .20 lows. Eyes on our range lows of .28-.29 for now. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction