Loading…
Published 25 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC · fetched 6 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC
Kayne (formerly Penguin)
@ThePenguinXBT
solana:2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv 🧪 Bit of a tricky one here counting-wise because of the corrective nature. However, we have been tracking this count for a long time and we are now just fulfilling what we expected here. For now I think we are working in a flat upwards, basically just a standard range. So I think a 1-3 is now in, looking for that corrective 4 back down before potentially a monster wave 5 upwards to those EQ highs, which would be my main DOL before shorts. Looks like a range, probably is a range.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 95.92 / 98.38 − 1 = -2.5%d × r = -2.5% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrectOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction