Prediction evidence

correctPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 24 Aug 2026, 01:22 UTC · fetched 3 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC

SalsaTekila

@SalsaTekila

In reply to · 23 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC · context given to the AI

BTC just had a 23% weekly candle. It's time to wake up if you're still not convinced. https://t.co/58HXrB5cX9

I also ran it as far back as possible for those interested in a deeper reference point and comparison. UP precedes UP. Momentum is a persistent edge, etc. Buy the dips; this thing goes to 90k the vast majority of the time. Visuals attached, retweet to help a bear-tard friend👇 https://t.co/7fw1CSMub2

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $76,911 at 24 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $79,822 at 25 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC.
r = 79821.9 / 76910.97 − 1 = +3.8%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = +3.8% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → correct

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “I also ran it as far back as possible for those interested in a deeper reference point and comparison. UP precedes UP. Momentum is a persistent edge, etc. Buy the dips; this thing goes to 90k the vast majority of the time. Visuals attached, retweet to help a bear-tard friend👇”
Confidence: 100%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction