Published 2 Aug 2026, 01:39 UTC · fetched 19 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC
CrediBULL Crypto
@CredibleCrypto
Quoting · 27 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC · context given to the AI
Starting to look more likely that we may just front-run our lows...seeing some LTF absorption into these local lows here, may be setting up for another LTF triple tap to send it back in the opposite direction... ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/MDFbQH9i9X https://t.co/1XX99AZlfaGot an initial reaction off the LTF range lows from the prior post but wasn't enough to reach the local highs and so we came lower to seek our more liq. In the same way we have a series of unswept lows on $BTC and $ETH (resting liq below) we now have a series of unswept highs on $CRV (resting liq above) on lower timeframes as we approach HTF support/demand in GREEN. With $CRV still holding up at range lows against its $BTC, $ETH and $XRP pairings (as shared in prior posts) this is the exactly the time where we would want to see $CRV show strength against the weakness of majors like $BTC and $ETH, which could explain why CRV looks more primed for upside/relief (with liq resting above) while BTC and ETH look more primed for a further correction (liq resting below). Will be interesting to see if $CRV can show relative strength against our majors here...View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
r = 1864.83 / 1855.11 − 1 = +0.52%d × r = -0.52% against a neutral band of ±1.25% → neutralOnly the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction